Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

duropal.by

Столешница для кухни, материалы для кухонной столешницы, компакт плита, компакт ламинат, Duropal, компакт плита купить в Минске. Купить столешницу из ...

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

483 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

384 ms

duropal.by screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Duropal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about duropal.by

Столешница Duropal - это качество! Столешница для кухни - сделай правильный выбор купив столешницу Duropal.

Visit duropal.by

Key Findings

We analyzed Duropal.by page load time and found that the first response time was 483 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

duropal.by performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,290 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.355

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

duropal.by

483 ms

www.stoleshnica.by

1206 ms

bootstrap.css

239 ms

style.css

341 ms

jquery.min.js

466 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Duropal.by, 71% (45 requests) were made to Stoleshnica.by and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Stoleshnica.by.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 92.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Duropal.by main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 43.7 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 22.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Duropal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 163.0 kB
  • After minification 162.9 kB
  • After compression 135.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 35.9 kB
  • After compression 25.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Duropal.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (36%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Duropal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

duropal.by accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

duropal.by best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

duropal.by SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Duropal.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Duropal.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Duropal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: