Tools & Wizards About Us
dust2018.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

dust2018.org

SAGYOTIME

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

860 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

496 ms

dust2018.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dust2018.org homepage info - get ready to check Dust 2018 best content right away, or after learning these important things about dust2018.org

Visit dust2018.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Dust2018.org page load time and found that the first response time was 860 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dust2018.org performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dust2018.org

860 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

499 ms

wpp.css

506 ms

style.css

503 ms

bootstrap.css

1168 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Dust2018.org, 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Dust2018.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 472.3 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

846.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dust2018.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 945.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 18.5 kB
  • After minification 17.7 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 193.6 kB

  • Original 945.8 kB
  • After minification 752.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dust 2018 needs image optimization as it can save up to 193.6 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 104.5 kB

  • Original 150.0 kB
  • After minification 133.2 kB
  • After compression 45.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 162.2 kB

  • Original 204.5 kB
  • After minification 167.3 kB
  • After compression 42.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dust2018.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 162.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (65%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dust 2018. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dust2018.org

dust2018.org

860 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

499 ms

wpp.css

wpp.css

506 ms

style.css

style.css

503 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

1168 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

670 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

504 ms

custom.css

custom.css

827 ms

wpp-4.2.0.min.js

wpp-4.2.0.min.js

837 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1335 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

836 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

879 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1038 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1054 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

1298 ms

jquery.tiles-gallery.js

jquery.tiles-gallery.js

1210 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1372 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

37 ms

symphony.png

symphony.png

495 ms

d0.jpg

d0.jpg

1329 ms

d0.png

d0.png

1838 ms

d1.jpg

d1.jpg

1503 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCTx8cP.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCTx8cP.ttf

9 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBO9a6Vc.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBO9a6Vc.ttf

33 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

900 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

1 ms

Accessibility Review

dust2018.org accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dust2018.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

dust2018.org SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dust2018.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dust2018.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dust2018.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dust 2018. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: