1.8 sec in total
152 ms
1.5 sec
145 ms
Click here to check amazing DWG content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dwg.repair
DWG Repair Kit efficiently combines a super-fast data analysis core with a user-friendly and self-explanatory interface.
Visit dwg.repairWe analyzed Dwg.repair page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
dwg.repair performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value2.9 s
79/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
152 ms
312 ms
168 ms
129 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Dwg.repair, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (462 ms) belongs to the original domain Dwg.repair.
Page size can be reduced by 530.7 kB (37%)
1.5 MB
919.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Dwg.repair main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 824.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DWG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 272.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 272.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 152.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dwg.repair needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (40%)
50
30
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DWG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dwg.repair
152 ms
www.dwg.repair
312 ms
bootstrap.css
168 ms
style.css
129 ms
jquery.js
179 ms
device.js
145 ms
bootstrap.js
186 ms
core.js
132 ms
script.js
192 ms
TMForm.js
251 ms
css
25 ms
font-awesome.css
92 ms
onepage-scroll.css
92 ms
flexslider.css
91 ms
history.js
46 ms
jquery.easing.js
49 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
77 ms
jquery.onepage-scroll.js
67 ms
hoverIntent.js
53 ms
superfish.js
48 ms
spin.min.js
82 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
90 ms
uScroll.js
84 ms
analytics.js
104 ms
menu_icon1_p6.png
87 ms
menu_icon2_p6.png
88 ms
menu_icon3_p6.png
87 ms
menu_icon4_p6.png
85 ms
menu_icon5_p6.png
85 ms
dwg_logo.png
285 ms
bkt_left.png
109 ms
bkt_right.png
121 ms
buy_bg.png
229 ms
buy.png
208 ms
logo_paypro.png
142 ms
support_bg.png
260 ms
securimage_show.php
462 ms
contacts_bg.png
323 ms
address.png
271 ms
email.png
294 ms
buy_renewal.png
338 ms
mail_ref.png
313 ms
TMpreviewLoader.gif
243 ms
collect
14 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
4 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
11 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
12 ms
collect
67 ms
collect
10 ms
menu_icon1_p1.png
67 ms
menu_icon2_p1.png
67 ms
menu_icon3_p1.png
65 ms
menu_icon4_p1.png
41 ms
menu_icon5_p1.png
40 ms
arrow_up_2.png
50 ms
arrow_down_2.png
67 ms
dwg.repair accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dwg.repair best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dwg.repair SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dwg.repair can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dwg.repair main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dwg.repair
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DWG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: