Tools & Wizards About Us
dynaflow.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

dynaflow.com

Dynaflow Research Group • Advanced Solutions in Engineering

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

452 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

dynaflow.com screenshot

About Website

Visit dynaflow.com now to see the best up-to-date Dynaflow content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dynaflow.com

We offer advanced engineering consultancy services and custom software solutions across the globe to solve the most complex engineering challenges.

Visit dynaflow.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dynaflow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 452 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dynaflow.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,090 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dynaflow.com

452 ms

dynaflow.com

482 ms

59fae.css

92 ms

a12bb.css

275 ms

35798.css

245 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Dynaflow.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (735 ms) belongs to the original domain Dynaflow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.0 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dynaflow.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 515.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 279.3 kB

  • Original 319.1 kB
  • After minification 319.1 kB
  • After compression 39.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 279.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 15.1 kB

  • Original 515.2 kB
  • After minification 500.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dynaflow images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 488.7 kB
  • After minification 488.7 kB
  • After compression 479.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 240 B

  • Original 120.7 kB
  • After minification 120.7 kB
  • After compression 120.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dynaflow.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (58%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dynaflow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dynaflow.com

dynaflow.com

452 ms

dynaflow.com

dynaflow.com

482 ms

59fae.css

59fae.css

92 ms

a12bb.css

a12bb.css

275 ms

35798.css

35798.css

245 ms

css

css

45 ms

ad1f1.css

ad1f1.css

249 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

337 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

255 ms

sdm_wp_scripts.js

sdm_wp_scripts.js

293 ms

sdm_g_recaptcha.js

sdm_g_recaptcha.js

331 ms

api.js

api.js

51 ms

iconHelper.js

iconHelper.js

332 ms

a1497.css

a1497.css

371 ms

2140c.css

2140c.css

377 ms

3c92f.css

3c92f.css

378 ms

a840b.css

a840b.css

459 ms

143373248.js

143373248.js

582 ms

eae.min.js

eae.min.js

484 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

484 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

456 ms

animated-main.min.js

animated-main.min.js

581 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

580 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

583 ms

vegas.min.js

vegas.min.js

582 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

583 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

582 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

584 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

584 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

637 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

637 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

637 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

637 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

659 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

657 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

710 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

713 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

715 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

718 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

733 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

735 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

723 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

562 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

559 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

564 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

63 ms

mnlsdsqlvt

mnlsdsqlvt

238 ms

font

font

209 ms

143373248.js

143373248.js

528 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

479 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

713 ms

fb.js

fb.js

480 ms

banner.js

banner.js

522 ms

font

font

24 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

324 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

233 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

469 ms

font

font

38 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

48 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

63 ms

DRG-Anniversary-Logo-3-300x300.png

DRG-Anniversary-Logo-3-300x300.png

107 ms

Dynaflow_Infographic_White.jpg

Dynaflow_Infographic_White.jpg

297 ms

image-1-scaled-ptzk1ux9n1mis7oeh9vugg2oo0m3h5u2o97m1oj8vs.jpg

image-1-scaled-ptzk1ux9n1mis7oeh9vugg2oo0m3h5u2o97m1oj8vs.jpg

105 ms

software2-e1658405451920-ptzk4d5rv521qs1bucw13taxp09c03sb0nu848tgag.png

software2-e1658405451920-ptzk4d5rv521qs1bucw13taxp09c03sb0nu848tgag.png

298 ms

RIW_20230914_022-thumbnail-qgezp396smkhek4ap5ryunsg1kjx2u61tro8jul3nc.jpg

RIW_20230914_022-thumbnail-qgezp396smkhek4ap5ryunsg1kjx2u61tro8jul3nc.jpg

246 ms

seawind-1024x799.jpg

seawind-1024x799.jpg

297 ms

shutterstock_707003635-1024x683.jpg

shutterstock_707003635-1024x683.jpg

248 ms

seawind_logo_transparent-1024x281.png

seawind_logo_transparent-1024x281.png

297 ms

DEME.png

DEME.png

299 ms

Shell.png

Shell.png

424 ms

Jord.png

Jord.png

425 ms

BP.png

BP.png

424 ms

ExxonMobil.png

ExxonMobil.png

425 ms

FLUOR.png

FLUOR.png

426 ms

DowChemicals.png

DowChemicals.png

427 ms

FPI.png

FPI.png

428 ms

WeirMinerals.png

WeirMinerals.png

436 ms

IV.png

IV.png

439 ms

Worley.png

Worley.png

439 ms

Yara.png

Yara.png

462 ms

BASF.png

BASF.png

467 ms

KochHeatTransfer.png

KochHeatTransfer.png

485 ms

rgeGEO.png

rgeGEO.png

525 ms

AtlasCopco.png

AtlasCopco.png

528 ms

Kelvion.png

Kelvion.png

528 ms

PDO.png

PDO.png

553 ms

Tronox.png

Tronox.png

556 ms

Total.png

Total.png

568 ms

Case-114-162x300.png

Case-114-162x300.png

611 ms

Untitled-design-64-300x200.png

Untitled-design-64-300x200.png

616 ms

Untitled-design-62-300x200.png

Untitled-design-62-300x200.png

613 ms

iso_9001_logo.svg

iso_9001_logo.svg

643 ms

js

js

61 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

35 ms

143373248.js

143373248.js

145 ms

collect

collect

92 ms

js

js

60 ms

c.gif

c.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

dynaflow.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dynaflow.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dynaflow.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dynaflow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dynaflow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dynaflow.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dynaflow. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: