8.5 sec in total
445 ms
5.3 sec
2.8 sec
Visit dynaflow.com now to see the best up-to-date Dynaflow content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dynaflow.com
Dynaflow Research GroupOur team of engineers is there for you!Consulting ServicesWe are experts in flow, vibrations and fiberglass pipingWe believe in sharing knowledge Join our Team now!VacanciesClea...
Visit dynaflow.comWe analyzed Dynaflow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 445 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
dynaflow.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.6 s
0/100
10%
Value23.1 s
0/100
25%
Value16.9 s
0/100
10%
Value12,730 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value32.0 s
0/100
10%
445 ms
1794 ms
481 ms
478 ms
576 ms
Our browser made a total of 136 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (110 requests) were addressed to the original Dynaflow.com, 8% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Dynaflow.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (31%)
3.4 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Dynaflow.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 267.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 267.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dynaflow images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 216.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 216.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 539.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dynaflow.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 539.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (53%)
118
55
The browser has sent 118 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dynaflow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dynaflow.com
445 ms
dynaflow.com
1794 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
481 ms
sdm_wp_styles.css
478 ms
style.min.css
576 ms
eae.min.css
638 ms
v4-shims.min.css
460 ms
all.min.css
519 ms
vegas.min.css
531 ms
main.css
529 ms
slick.css
551 ms
recent-post-style.css
613 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
623 ms
style.min.css
622 ms
theme.min.css
630 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
667 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
705 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
550 ms
app.css
551 ms
style.css
553 ms
general.min.css
553 ms
css
86 ms
fontawesome.min.css
618 ms
solid.min.css
600 ms
brands.min.css
610 ms
jquery.min.js
783 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
635 ms
main.js
634 ms
sdm_wp_scripts.js
689 ms
sdm_g_recaptcha.js
697 ms
api.js
98 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
703 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
659 ms
in.js
48 ms
eae.min.js
495 ms
v4-shims.min.js
558 ms
animated-main.min.js
922 ms
particles.min.js
923 ms
magnific.min.js
924 ms
vegas.min.js
924 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
950 ms
general.min.js
939 ms
complianz.min.js
927 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
904 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
840 ms
slick.min.js
837 ms
wppsac-public.js
1181 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1171 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1151 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1098 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1254 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1086 ms
hooks.min.js
1378 ms
i18n.min.js
1347 ms
frontend.min.js
1341 ms
waypoints.min.js
1298 ms
core.min.js
1265 ms
frontend.min.js
1264 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1537 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1531 ms
recaptcha__en.js
515 ms
logo_dynaflow.svg
1130 ms
offshore-wind-turbine-scaled.jpg
1383 ms
RIW_20220623_021-scaled.jpg
1308 ms
RIW_20220623_009-scaled.jpg
1142 ms
RIW_20220623_042-scaled.jpg
1308 ms
seawind.jpg
1301 ms
FRP-Pipes-scaled.jpg
1373 ms
RIW_20220623_047-scaled.jpg
1314 ms
RIW_20220623_050-scaled.jpg
1373 ms
seawind-150x150.jpg
1308 ms
shutterstock_1774888646-150x150.jpg
1380 ms
Meeting2-2-1024x576.jpg
1186 ms
shutterstock_701621245_rescale.jpg
1183 ms
Whats-new-in-BOSfluids-7.0-300x200.jpg
1269 ms
very-large-model-1-klein-300x200.png
1269 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4AQ.ttf
533 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERySiA.ttf
535 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERySiA.ttf
676 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiA.ttf
785 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERySiA.ttf
917 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1258 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1307 ms
eicons.woff
1371 ms
HYB114-A-Product-Fall-Program_-Pipe-Stress-Analysis-1-300x200.jpg
1300 ms
load-case-schedule-1-300x200.png
1459 ms
RIW_20220624_055-klein-300x200.jpg
1458 ms
switch-between-2d-3d-1-300x200.png
1293 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1124 ms
firewater-300x200.png
1123 ms
geothermie-300x200.jpg
1124 ms
BP1klein-300x200.png
961 ms
open-foam-300x200.png
1016 ms
seawind_logo_transparent.png
1015 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
90 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
330 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
339 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
337 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
339 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
340 ms
Jord.png
898 ms
Shell.png
898 ms
rgeGEO.png
900 ms
KochHeatTransfer.png
927 ms
AtlasCopco.png
923 ms
BASF.png
904 ms
DEME.png
658 ms
DowChemicals.png
656 ms
ExxonMobil.png
680 ms
FLUOR.png
570 ms
FPI.png
559 ms
IV.png
561 ms
Kelvion.png
558 ms
BP.png
561 ms
PDO.png
588 ms
gtm.js
88 ms
Total.png
602 ms
Tronox.png
602 ms
WeirMinerals.png
600 ms
Worley.png
596 ms
Yara.png
594 ms
Seawind-klein.png
881 ms
analytics.js
124 ms
iso_9001_logo.svg
806 ms
arrow-left.png
803 ms
FollowCompany.js
213 ms
ajax-loader.gif
748 ms
arrow-right.png
747 ms
collect
83 ms
collect
58 ms
FollowCompany
4 ms
FollowCompany
137 ms
ga-audiences
18 ms
8btwenvly3jsm3s49lzpi2q6c
89 ms
in.js
14 ms
cwphtfsvdwm4k6n91alllgs6q
356 ms
dynaflow.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
dynaflow.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dynaflow.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dynaflow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dynaflow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dynaflow.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dynaflow. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: