Tools & Wizards About Us
dynamark.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

dynamark.cc

Alarm & Home Security Systems, Home Theater, CCTV & Surveillance Cameras Texas

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

849 ms

Page Rendered

355 ms

dynamark.cc screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Dynamark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dynamark.cc

Alarm & Home Security Systems, CCTV & Surveillance Cameras, Home Theater, and Fire Alarm Systems in Alice, Corpus Christi, Harlingen, Kingsville, McAllen, Portland, TX, and the Surrounding Areas.

Visit dynamark.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Dynamark.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dynamark.cc performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.248

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dynamark.cc

133 ms

www.dynamark.cc

407 ms

css

34 ms

style.min.css

32 ms

styles.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Dynamark.cc, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (407 ms) belongs to the original domain Dynamark.cc.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.2 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Dynamark.cc main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 49.0 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dynamark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 221.3 kB
  • After minification 221.3 kB
  • After compression 220.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (60%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dynamark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dynamark.cc

dynamark.cc

133 ms

www.dynamark.cc

www.dynamark.cc

407 ms

css

css

34 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

32 ms

styles.css

styles.css

40 ms

page-list.css

page-list.css

79 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

fa.css

fa.css

40 ms

animate.css

animate.css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

62 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

55 ms

core.jquery.ui.js

core.jquery.ui.js

90 ms

core.plugins.js

core.plugins.js

108 ms

jquery.waypoints.js

jquery.waypoints.js

73 ms

jquery.plugin.js

jquery.plugin.js

74 ms

jquery.init.js

jquery.init.js

115 ms

js

js

125 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

152 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

149 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

150 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

154 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

155 ms

index.js

index.js

154 ms

index.js

index.js

155 ms

api.js

api.js

50 ms

index.js

index.js

157 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

158 ms

widget.js

widget.js

189 ms

logo.png

logo.png

91 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

91 ms

home-slider1a.jpg

home-slider1a.jpg

93 ms

dynamark-security-1.jpg

dynamark-security-1.jpg

93 ms

dynamark-security-2.jpg

dynamark-security-2.jpg

92 ms

dynamark-security-3.jpg

dynamark-security-3.jpg

120 ms

dynamark-security-4.jpg

dynamark-security-4.jpg

121 ms

bottom-bg.jpg

bottom-bg.jpg

122 ms

footer-marker.png

footer-marker.png

119 ms

soap_screened_and_approved.png

soap_screened_and_approved.png

118 ms

bbb.png

bbb.png

119 ms

builders-assoc.png

builders-assoc.png

171 ms

cards.png

cards.png

172 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

91 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

91 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

115 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

90 ms

prev.png

prev.png

57 ms

next.png

next.png

58 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

46 ms

Accessibility Review

dynamark.cc accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

dynamark.cc best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dynamark.cc SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dynamark.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dynamark.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dynamark.cc

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dynamark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: