6.8 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.7 sec
510 ms
Visit dynatex.de now to see the best up-to-date Dynatex content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dynatex.de
Erinnerungen an den geilsten Versandhändler im Pott.
Visit dynatex.deWe analyzed Dynatex.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
dynatex.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.479
18/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
1588 ms
223 ms
137 ms
283 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Dynatex.de, 21% (9 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 341.1 kB (49%)
697.4 kB
356.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Dynatex.de main page is 697.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 222.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 141.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 141.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dynatex images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 109.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.5 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dynatex.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (79%)
39
8
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dynatex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.dynatex.de
1588 ms
d68393dba0dcfbf2d3e38e5e39795360.css
223 ms
style.min.css
137 ms
themezee-magazine-blocks.css
283 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
154 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
152 ms
style.css
263 ms
safari-flexbox-fixes.css
257 ms
ytprefs.min.css
320 ms
jetpack.css
173 ms
190%2C000000%2Cnone%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2CFFFFFF%2C000000%2Cleft%2C0%2C0-391-811-76p-70a1kj-062-783c-293009-9017x1z-33iframe_banner-402-44100
396 ms
laden1.gif
726 ms
uc.js
185 ms
jquery.min.js
169 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
147 ms
sticky-header.js
276 ms
svgxuse.min.js
416 ms
ytprefs.min.js
463 ms
adsbygoogle.js
160 ms
cd.js
229 ms
photon.min.js
124 ms
navigation.min.js
500 ms
intersection-observer.js
475 ms
lazy-images.js
474 ms
fitvids.min.js
491 ms
e-202239.js
157 ms
genericons-neue.svg
667 ms
Dynatex-Werbeanzeige-Video-Games-01-1994-2.png
1673 ms
jquery.min.js
72 ms
jsbase.min.js
227 ms
configuration.js
629 ms
cc.js
118 ms
bc-v4.min.html
771 ms
cdreport.js
141 ms
jsbase.min.js
27 ms
main.min.css
12 ms
0.png
42 ms
l1x2.png
45 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
223 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
9 ms
sticky-header.js
17 ms
svgxuse.min.js
212 ms
dynatex.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
dynatex.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
dynatex.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dynatex.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dynatex.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dynatex.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dynatex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: