2.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
1.7 sec
136 ms
Visit dytexgroup.com now to see the best up-to-date Dytexgroup content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dytexgroup.com
Dytex Industries was incorporated in 2009 as a small scale dyestuff manufacturing unit. Today, dytex group has emerged as a leading business […]
Visit dytexgroup.comWe analyzed Dytexgroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
dytexgroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value21.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value940 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.286
42/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
1080 ms
77 ms
78 ms
75 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Dytexgroup.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dytexgroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 506.6 kB (43%)
1.2 MB
676.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Dytexgroup.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 860.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 186.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dytexgroup needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 303.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.7 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dytexgroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (88%)
34
4
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dytexgroup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dytexgroup.com
1080 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
77 ms
style.min.css
78 ms
layerslider.css
75 ms
css
20 ms
styles.css
70 ms
settings.css
72 ms
css
18 ms
style.css
117 ms
font-awesome.css
139 ms
ilightbox.css
141 ms
animations.css
143 ms
greensock.js
177 ms
jquery.min.js
188 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
198 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
242 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
209 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
263 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
282 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
318 ms
index.js
269 ms
comment-reply.min.js
275 ms
main.min.js
445 ms
api.js
36 ms
index.js
318 ms
wp-embed.min.js
345 ms
logo1.png
71 ms
logo.png
103 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf
27 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf
28 ms
bWt97fPFfRzkCa9Jlp6IacVcWQ.ttf
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
129 ms
icomoon.woff
71 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
70 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
87 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
116 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
123 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
139 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
154 ms
recaptcha__en.js
39 ms
dytexgroup.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dytexgroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
dytexgroup.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dytexgroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dytexgroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dytexgroup.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dytexgroup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: