Tools & Wizards About Us
finance.digitallook.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

finance.digitallook.com

Share Prices, trading charts & news alerts - Sharecast.com

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

177 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

823 ms

finance.digitallook.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Finance Digitallook content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about finance.digitallook.com

Sharecast: share prices, live trading charts, international company research and market news alerts for investors and financial media.

Visit finance.digitallook.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Finance.digitallook.com page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

finance.digitallook.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value51.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value81,560 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value113.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

finance.digitallook.com

177 ms

home

197 ms

www.digitallook.com

173 ms

www.sharecast.com

575 ms

vortexloader.js

216 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Finance.digitallook.com, 54% (48 requests) were made to Rsrc.s3wfg.com and 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Quantcast.mgr.consensu.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 96.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

341.6 kB

After Optimization

245.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Finance.digitallook.com main page is 341.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 114.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 93.8 kB

  • Original 114.0 kB
  • After minification 111.9 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 54.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Finance Digitallook images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 86.9 kB
  • After minification 86.9 kB
  • After compression 85.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 85.1 kB
  • After minification 85.1 kB
  • After compression 85.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Finance.digitallook.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (64%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Finance Digitallook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

finance.digitallook.com

finance.digitallook.com

177 ms

home

home

197 ms

www.digitallook.com

www.digitallook.com

173 ms

www.sharecast.com

www.sharecast.com

575 ms

vortexloader.js

vortexloader.js

216 ms

sharecast.bundle.css

sharecast.bundle.css

324 ms

css

css

133 ms

js

js

204 ms

client.js

client.js

778 ms

api.js

api.js

204 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

97 ms

sharecast.bundle.js

sharecast.bundle.js

915 ms

lightstreamer-7.0.3.js

lightstreamer-7.0.3.js

848 ms

wfgLightstreamer-Media.js

wfgLightstreamer-Media.js

837 ms

wfgLightstreamerMediaFunctions-v2.js

wfgLightstreamerMediaFunctions-v2.js

922 ms

ls_webfg_v2.js

ls_webfg_v2.js

913 ms

css

css

58 ms

choice.js

choice.js

1415 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

1362 ms

ticker-grey.html

ticker-grey.html

1043 ms

sharecast.png

sharecast.png

1125 ms

dott-deco-green.png

dott-deco-green.png

1209 ms

cc.png

cc.png

1169 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

1327 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

1061 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

1138 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

1357 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

1356 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf_.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf_.ttf

1409 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf

1354 ms

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

1357 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf_.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf_.ttf

1407 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

1408 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf

1407 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf

1414 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf

1407 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

1019 ms

0745eb61-690f-4475-99d7-1b77fb231ae4.js

0745eb61-690f-4475-99d7-1b77fb231ae4.js

1319 ms

uk.png

uk.png

367 ms

it.png

it.png

338 ms

es.png

es.png

642 ms

pt.png

pt.png

335 ms

fr.png

fr.png

365 ms

de.png

de.png

360 ms

zh.png

zh.png

364 ms

ru.png

ru.png

364 ms

da.png

da.png

641 ms

hr.png

hr.png

582 ms

nl.png

nl.png

581 ms

fi.png

fi.png

582 ms

ja.png

ja.png

653 ms

sv.png

sv.png

976 ms

no.png

no.png

715 ms

pl.png

pl.png

724 ms

ro.png

ro.png

720 ms

sr.png

sr.png

906 ms

tr.png

tr.png

721 ms

id.png

id.png

721 ms

bs.png

bs.png

974 ms

bg.png

bg.png

974 ms

ca.png

ca.png

722 ms

cs.png

cs.png

736 ms

el.png

el.png

737 ms

af.png

af.png

901 ms

sq.png

sq.png

901 ms

am.png

am.png

904 ms

ar.png

ar.png

902 ms

hy.png

hy.png

993 ms

az.png

az.png

903 ms

eu.png

eu.png

970 ms

be.png

be.png

993 ms

facebook

facebook

613 ms

google

google

632 ms

graph

graph

526 ms

graph

graph

820 ms

graph

graph

567 ms

graph

graph

827 ms

bn.png

bn.png

818 ms

ceb.png

ceb.png

781 ms

ny.png

ny.png

811 ms

collect

collect

310 ms

co.png

co.png

667 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

242 ms

collect

collect

365 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

81 ms

materialdesignicons.min.css

materialdesignicons.min.css

49 ms

moment-with-locales.min.js

moment-with-locales.min.js

141 ms

materialdesignicons-webfont.woff

materialdesignicons-webfont.woff

288 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

451 ms

Accessibility Review

finance.digitallook.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

finance.digitallook.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

finance.digitallook.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Finance.digitallook.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Finance.digitallook.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

finance.digitallook.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Finance Digitallook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: