Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

Page Load Speed

182 ms in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

135 ms

Page Rendered

1 ms

hope.dukejournals.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hope Dukejournals content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hope.dukejournals.org

Visit hope.dukejournals.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Hope.dukejournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 136 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hope.dukejournals.org performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.134

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hope.dukejournals.org

46 ms

UrlRedirectHandler.ashx

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hope.dukejournals.org, 50% (1 request) were made to Read.dukeupress.edu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (46 ms) belongs to the original domain Hope.dukejournals.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 726.3 kB (78%)

Content Size

932.7 kB

After Optimization

206.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Hope.dukejournals.org main page is 932.7 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 569.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 898 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 689 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 898 B or 57% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 406.0 kB

  • Original 569.2 kB
  • After minification 552.9 kB
  • After compression 163.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 319.4 kB

  • Original 361.8 kB
  • After minification 290.0 kB
  • After compression 42.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hope.dukejournals.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 319.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

hope.dukejournals.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

hope.dukejournals.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

hope.dukejournals.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hope.dukejournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Hope.dukejournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hope Dukejournals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: