Tools & Wizards About Us
indianapolis.diningguide.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

indianapolis.diningguide.com

Indianapolis Restaurants: Find Restaurant Information and Reviews in Indianapolis by DiningGuide

Page Load Speed

20.5 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

20.1 sec

Page Rendered

167 ms

indianapolis.diningguide.com screenshot

About Website

Visit indianapolis.diningguide.com now to see the best up-to-date Indianapolis Dining Guide content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about indianapolis.diningguide.com

DiningGuide's Directory of Indianapolis Restaurants. Read unbiased reviews from people who have eaten at the restaurants listed.

Visit indianapolis.diningguide.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Indianapolis.diningguide.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 20.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

indianapolis.diningguide.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,540 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.996

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

indianapolis.diningguide.com

165 ms

dg-home-std.v3.css

229 ms

adsbygoogle.js

166 ms

t_dg.v3.gif

225 ms

mcmn.png

226 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Indianapolis.diningguide.com, 23% (18 requests) were made to Lib.nu and 19% (15 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Ads.metromanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 216.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

985.7 kB

After Optimization

769.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Indianapolis.diningguide.com main page is 985.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 783.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 25.5 kB

  • Original 33.7 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 15.1 kB

  • Original 166.9 kB
  • After minification 151.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indianapolis Dining Guide images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 175.6 kB

  • Original 783.0 kB
  • After minification 783.0 kB
  • After compression 607.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 175.6 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indianapolis.diningguide.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (61%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indianapolis Dining Guide. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

indianapolis.diningguide.com

indianapolis.diningguide.com

165 ms

dg-home-std.v3.css

dg-home-std.v3.css

229 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

166 ms

t_dg.v3.gif

t_dg.v3.gif

225 ms

mcmn.png

mcmn.png

226 ms

talk.gif

talk.gif

227 ms

b_dg_go.gif

b_dg_go.gif

227 ms

d.gif

d.gif

228 ms

468x60_tickets.gif

468x60_tickets.gif

19978 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

77 ms

l_mgn_996.gif

l_mgn_996.gif

227 ms

m_dgind-hp.gif

m_dgind-hp.gif

227 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

242 ms

t_dg.v3.gif

t_dg.v3.gif

154 ms

mcmn.png

mcmn.png

153 ms

dg-home-std.v3.css

dg-home-std.v3.css

161 ms

b_dg_go.gif

b_dg_go.gif

204 ms

talk.gif

talk.gif

203 ms

d.gif

d.gif

204 ms

l_mgn_996.gif

l_mgn_996.gif

202 ms

m_dgind-hp.gif

m_dgind-hp.gif

202 ms

smileysml_dg_3.0.gif

smileysml_dg_3.0.gif

33 ms

smileysml_dg_3.0.gif

smileysml_dg_3.0.gif

69 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

30 ms

ads

ads

606 ms

ads

ads

427 ms

ads

ads

390 ms

ads

ads

416 ms

gen_204

gen_204

175 ms

pixel

pixel

173 ms

15743343646040365059

15743343646040365059

37 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

24 ms

omrhp.js

omrhp.js

23 ms

Q12zgMmT.js

Q12zgMmT.js

25 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

31 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

32 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

31 ms

icon.png

icon.png

12 ms

pixel

pixel

161 ms

dv3.js

dv3.js

149 ms

gen_204

gen_204

160 ms

62bHydCX.html

62bHydCX.html

132 ms

activeview

activeview

90 ms

pixel

pixel

54 ms

ad

ad

67 ms

pixel

pixel

42 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

159 ms

NFZ1mOwYxEzu3Trb4QHr3oiOeNElDH4Ziz6mMFaiIXI.js

NFZ1mOwYxEzu3Trb4QHr3oiOeNElDH4Ziz6mMFaiIXI.js

8 ms

4350025624135612707

4350025624135612707

76 ms

pixel

pixel

31 ms

rum

rum

47 ms

bounce

bounce

84 ms

activeview

activeview

74 ms

rum

rum

56 ms

pixel

pixel

54 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

63 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

226 ms

s

s

62 ms

8f33fcfe8f3fcce72fae06ada870480b.js

8f33fcfe8f3fcce72fae06ada870480b.js

171 ms

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

68 ms

interstitial_ad_frame.js

interstitial_ad_frame.js

117 ms

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

208 ms

settings_grey600_24dp.png

settings_grey600_24dp.png

165 ms

gen_204

gen_204

113 ms

pixel

pixel

114 ms

16182736279547048795

16182736279547048795

156 ms

R42IGImpressionTrackerIABTCF22m.js

R42IGImpressionTrackerIABTCF22m.js

195 ms

pixel

pixel

91 ms

pixel

pixel

89 ms

css

css

90 ms

activeview

activeview

81 ms

setuid

setuid

77 ms

rum

rum

51 ms

pixel

pixel

52 ms

pixel

pixel

52 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

52 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

52 ms

rum

rum

48 ms

Accessibility Review

indianapolis.diningguide.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

indianapolis.diningguide.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

indianapolis.diningguide.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indianapolis.diningguide.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Indianapolis.diningguide.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

indianapolis.diningguide.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indianapolis Dining Guide. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: