Tools & Wizards About Us
products.databasejournal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

products.databasejournal.com

Database Journal: Database Trends & Guides for Professionals

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

products.databasejournal.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Products Database Journal content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about products.databasejournal.com

DatabaseJournal.com publishes relevant articles on database hardware and management tools. Read our expert guides and best practices for professionals.

Visit products.databasejournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Products.databasejournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

products.databasejournal.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,150 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.databasejournal.com

36 ms

css

261 ms

style.min.css

13 ms

frontend.min.css

28 ms

flatpickr.min.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Products.databasejournal.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source J.6sc.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 465.3 kB (47%)

Content Size

996.0 kB

After Optimization

530.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Products.databasejournal.com main page is 996.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 436.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 379.2 kB

  • Original 436.4 kB
  • After minification 412.3 kB
  • After compression 57.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 379.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 33.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Products Database Journal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 63.6 kB

  • Original 371.6 kB
  • After minification 371.5 kB
  • After compression 308.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

  • Original 153.3 kB
  • After minification 137.5 kB
  • After compression 132.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Products.databasejournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (73%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Products Database Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.databasejournal.com

www.databasejournal.com

36 ms

css

css

261 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

13 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

28 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

32 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

42 ms

style.css

style.css

43 ms

style.css

style.css

40 ms

default.css

default.css

41 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

td_legacy_main.css

td_legacy_main.css

55 ms

td_standard_pack_main.css

td_standard_pack_main.css

66 ms

tdb_main.css

tdb_main.css

52 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

54 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

54 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

262 ms

advanced.min.js

advanced.min.js

263 ms

conditions.min.js

conditions.min.js

263 ms

js

js

327 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

327 ms

styles.css

styles.css

258 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

259 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

258 ms

layer.js

layer.js

260 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

262 ms

advanced-ads-pro.min.js

advanced-ads-pro.min.js

260 ms

custom.js

custom.js

259 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

261 ms

js_posts_autoload.min.js

js_posts_autoload.min.js

260 ms

tagdiv_theme.min.js

tagdiv_theme.min.js

320 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

261 ms

tracking.min.js

tracking.min.js

320 ms

delayed.min.js

delayed.min.js

262 ms

js_files_for_front.min.js

js_files_for_front.min.js

319 ms

ouibounce.js

ouibounce.js

262 ms

ta-campaign-public.js

ta-campaign-public.js

262 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

319 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

204 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

25 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

356 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

415 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

415 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

355 ms

DPEtYwqExx0AWHX5Ax4B.ttf

DPEtYwqExx0AWHX5Ax4B.ttf

414 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

413 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

414 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

415 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

1338 ms

newspaper.woff

newspaper.woff

66 ms

01192dc3-157f-4d5a-bea4-02f62692239e.js

01192dc3-157f-4d5a-bea4-02f62692239e.js

1563 ms

js

js

1284 ms

noniab-vendorlist.json

noniab-vendorlist.json

1543 ms

5055

5055

1393 ms

js

js

309 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

218 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

219 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

219 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

301 ms

Montserrat-Regular.woff

Montserrat-Regular.woff

60 ms

Montserrat-Bold.woff

Montserrat-Bold.woff

59 ms

DBJ_logo_MobileLogo-copy-2.png

DBJ_logo_MobileLogo-copy-2.png

165 ms

DBJ_logo_MainLogo-copy-2.png

DBJ_logo_MainLogo-copy-2.png

165 ms

DBJ_logo_MainLogo-copy-4.png

DBJ_logo_MainLogo-copy-4.png

166 ms

TAwhitefooter.png

TAwhitefooter.png

166 ms

eweekfooter.png

eweekfooter.png

165 ms

datamationwhitefooter.png

datamationwhitefooter.png

167 ms

PMcomwhitefooter-09.png

PMcomwhitefooter-09.png

167 ms

webowhitefooter.png

webowhitefooter.png

167 ms

esecuritywhitefooter.png

esecuritywhitefooter.png

167 ms

serverwatchwhitefooter-10.png

serverwatchwhitefooter-10.png

169 ms

ITBEwhitefooter-copy.png

ITBEwhitefooter-copy.png

168 ms

vendor-list.json

vendor-list.json

200 ms

choice.js

choice.js

293 ms

js

js

64 ms

6si.min.js

6si.min.js

46 ms

getuidj

getuidj

67 ms

img.gif

img.gif

62 ms

img.gif

img.gif

62 ms

cmp2-polyfilled.js

cmp2-polyfilled.js

10 ms

geoip

geoip

158 ms

zi-tag.js

zi-tag.js

207 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

27 ms

Accessibility Review

products.databasejournal.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

products.databasejournal.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

products.databasejournal.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Products.databasejournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Products.databasejournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

products.databasejournal.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Products Database Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: