Tools & Wizards About Us
corpstaging.ezetap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

corpstaging.ezetap.com

Payment Aggregator | SAAS Payment Platform | Payment Solutions By Ezetap

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

418 ms

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

737 ms

corpstaging.ezetap.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to corpstaging.ezetap.com homepage info - get ready to check Corpstaging Ezetap best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about corpstaging.ezetap.com

Ezetap offers smart payment solution for businesses to accept any mode of payment from their customers. Populary known as best SAAS platform in India.

Visit corpstaging.ezetap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Corpstaging.ezetap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 418 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

corpstaging.ezetap.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,760 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

corpstaging.ezetap.com

418 ms

corpstaging.ezetap.com

966 ms

bootstrap.min.css

387 ms

style.css

952 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

569 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Corpstaging.ezetap.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Corpstaging.ezetap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.9 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Corpstaging.ezetap.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

  • Original 78.3 kB
  • After minification 69.5 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Corpstaging Ezetap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 61.1 kB
  • After minification 61.1 kB
  • After compression 48.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 25 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Corpstaging.ezetap.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (39%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

58

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Corpstaging Ezetap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

corpstaging.ezetap.com

corpstaging.ezetap.com

418 ms

corpstaging.ezetap.com

corpstaging.ezetap.com

966 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

387 ms

style.css

style.css

952 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

569 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

571 ms

animate.css

animate.css

577 ms

masonry.css

masonry.css

573 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.css

bootstrap-datetimepicker.css

574 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

164 ms

sharethis.js

sharethis.js

192 ms

waitMe.css

waitMe.css

752 ms

api.js

api.js

191 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1336 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

584 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

582 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

587 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

758 ms

tabcollapse.js

tabcollapse.js

1333 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

1335 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

1337 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

1534 ms

modernizr.custom.26633.js

modernizr.custom.26633.js

1533 ms

jquery.gridrotator.js

jquery.gridrotator.js

1532 ms

custom-script.js

custom-script.js

1500 ms

moment.js

moment.js

1533 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.js

1621 ms

script.js

script.js

1727 ms

Tracker.js

Tracker.js

1336 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

850 ms

desk-nav-17-08-2022.png

desk-nav-17-08-2022.png

1132 ms

mob-nav-17-08-2022.png

mob-nav-17-08-2022.png

782 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

780 ms

head-down.png

head-down.png

779 ms

Banner-4-05.jpg

Banner-4-05.jpg

1142 ms

play.png

play.png

1128 ms

Ezetap_Banner_Desktop.jpg

Ezetap_Banner_Desktop.jpg

1626 ms

number-banner-desk.jpg

number-banner-desk.jpg

2480 ms

Banner-4-05-mobile.jpg

Banner-4-05-mobile.jpg

1150 ms

Ezetap_Banner_Mobile.jpg

Ezetap_Banner_Mobile.jpg

1543 ms

number-banner-mob.jpg

number-banner-mob.jpg

1802 ms

bg-patt.png

bg-patt.png

1251 ms

reliance.png

reliance.png

1543 ms

airtel.png

airtel.png

1622 ms

bajaj.png

bajaj.png

1622 ms

amazon.png

amazon.png

1624 ms

indane.png

indane.png

1854 ms

ladder.png

ladder.png

1854 ms

fedex.png

fedex.png

1855 ms

basket.png

basket.png

1838 ms

w_1.png

w_1.png

1933 ms

color_2.png

color_2.png

1972 ms

w_2.png

w_2.png

1969 ms

color_1.png

color_1.png

1972 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

727 ms

w_3.png

w_3.png

1630 ms

color_3.png

color_3.png

1762 ms

img1.png

img1.png

1994 ms

img1-xs.png

img1-xs.png

1993 ms

img2.png

img2.png

1821 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

1809 ms

img4-xs.jpg

img4-xs.jpg

1749 ms

img5.png

img5.png

1812 ms

youtube1.png

youtube1.png

2028 ms

youtube1-xs.png

youtube1-xs.png

2076 ms

youtube2.png

youtube2.png

1971 ms

youtube2-xs.png

youtube2-xs.png

1992 ms

cnbc-make-it.png

cnbc-make-it.png

1808 ms

history.png

history.png

1896 ms

cnbc.png

cnbc.png

1985 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

331 ms

bbc.png

bbc.png

1726 ms

cb.png

cb.png

1744 ms

economic.png

economic.png

1781 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

400 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

501 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

419 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

555 ms

toi.png

toi.png

1679 ms

fallback

fallback

107 ms

fallback

fallback

139 ms

icon-mail.svg

icon-mail.svg

1412 ms

sisa.png

sisa.png

1425 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

1422 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

1439 ms

cancel.svg

cancel.svg

1491 ms

fancybox_loading.gif

fancybox_loading.gif

1489 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

98 ms

230 ms

identity.js

identity.js

83 ms

301694373554118

301694373554118

218 ms

css

css

190 ms

collect

collect

114 ms

66 ms

collect

collect

99 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

35 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

55 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

62 ms

1858701697521391

1858701697521391

76 ms

19 ms

Accessibility Review

corpstaging.ezetap.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

corpstaging.ezetap.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

corpstaging.ezetap.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corpstaging.ezetap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corpstaging.ezetap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

corpstaging.ezetap.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Corpstaging Ezetap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: