Tools & Wizards About Us
debates.economist.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

debates.economist.com

The Economist | Independent journalism

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

684 ms

Page Rendered

477 ms

debates.economist.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Debates Economist content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about debates.economist.com

Get in-depth global news and analysis. Our coverage spans world politics, business, tech, culture and more. Subscribe for free trial.

Visit debates.economist.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Debates.economist.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

debates.economist.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,090 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.181

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

debates.economist.com

42 ms

css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css

10 ms

css_51jAj5gdi1UOs7R7fNpxnR1JS3IteL-BeqIYPGrvaXk.css

13 ms

css_zAcZ9UfMhroMTiwBY2Nc7Tg6OnooHZLdswoO4Z7iMEc.css

13 ms

slick.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Debates.economist.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Tags.bluekai.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Consent.truste.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (225 ms) relates to the external source Consent.truste.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 470.7 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Debates.economist.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 711.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 30.0 kB

  • Original 39.4 kB
  • After minification 33.3 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 711.8 kB
  • After minification 707.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Debates Economist images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 309.1 kB

  • Original 488.7 kB
  • After minification 455.5 kB
  • After compression 179.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 309.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 127.2 kB

  • Original 273.2 kB
  • After minification 270.4 kB
  • After compression 145.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Debates.economist.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 127.2 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (57%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Debates Economist. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

debates.economist.com

debates.economist.com

42 ms

css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css

css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css

10 ms

css_51jAj5gdi1UOs7R7fNpxnR1JS3IteL-BeqIYPGrvaXk.css

css_51jAj5gdi1UOs7R7fNpxnR1JS3IteL-BeqIYPGrvaXk.css

13 ms

css_zAcZ9UfMhroMTiwBY2Nc7Tg6OnooHZLdswoO4Z7iMEc.css

css_zAcZ9UfMhroMTiwBY2Nc7Tg6OnooHZLdswoO4Z7iMEc.css

13 ms

slick.css

slick.css

18 ms

css_yx12vsxhwhB_95L-I_UtpMCRtGby97wHQulFe_FqsYs.css

css_yx12vsxhwhB_95L-I_UtpMCRtGby97wHQulFe_FqsYs.css

19 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

js_IkgOrrVZK1UTp2HktvFi5vo1g7b25Muyr5GoySikuic.js

js_IkgOrrVZK1UTp2HktvFi5vo1g7b25Muyr5GoySikuic.js

15 ms

js_H7q2xORKmR9AN8Qx5spKEIBp7R_wG2apAswJoCUZY7I.js

js_H7q2xORKmR9AN8Qx5spKEIBp7R_wG2apAswJoCUZY7I.js

27 ms

js_JY0PLUW3vHNpoXL11sEziWjjUyejOcP-_kArn_JZWMk.js

js_JY0PLUW3vHNpoXL11sEziWjjUyejOcP-_kArn_JZWMk.js

27 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

24 ms

js_R9LA7-dwbAiHpk7xk09Qxz5-q3z7V-0xIrPlDZSb8Oo.js

js_R9LA7-dwbAiHpk7xk09Qxz5-q3z7V-0xIrPlDZSb8Oo.js

25 ms

notice

notice

175 ms

omniture.js

omniture.js

26 ms

ec-custom-fonts.css

ec-custom-fonts.css

33 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

5 ms

me%20aug%202014.jpg

me%20aug%202014.jpg

7 ms

deborah%20sherry%20small.PNG

deborah%20sherry%20small.PNG

7 ms

Jonathan-Cooper.jpg

Jonathan-Cooper.jpg

8 ms

Helen%20Joyce%20Headshot%20Spring2015.jpg

Helen%20Joyce%20Headshot%20Spring2015.jpg

7 ms

Gallop_Y_headshot.jpg

Gallop_Y_headshot.jpg

8 ms

Jensen_N_headshot.jpg

Jensen_N_headshot.jpg

8 ms

ludwigsiegele.jpg

ludwigsiegele.jpg

8 ms

crosby2.jpg

crosby2.jpg

9 ms

schneier.jpg

schneier.jpg

9 ms

get

get

225 ms

NEW-DEBATE-ARTWORK-%5B3%5D.jpg

NEW-DEBATE-ARTWORK-%5B3%5D.jpg

125 ms

utag.js

utag.js

129 ms

page.js

page.js

89 ms

bk-coretag.js

bk-coretag.js

89 ms

debates.economist.com

debates.economist.com

84 ms

smartphone%20hall%20FINAL.jpg

smartphone%20hall%20FINAL.jpg

77 ms

2000X243%5BQUALITY90%5D_1.jpg

2000X243%5BQUALITY90%5D_1.jpg

80 ms

42EX7spdjAA

42EX7spdjAA

21 ms

jYRfuyl2MAA=

jYRfuyl2MAA=

22 ms

utag.6.js

utag.6.js

10 ms

get

get

109 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

7 ms

18452

18452

72 ms

r2

r2

13 ms

pubads_impl_81.js

pubads_impl_81.js

15 ms

container.html

container.html

32 ms

adsct

adsct

122 ms

65 ms

2222

2222

27 ms

16365

16365

76 ms

55 ms

2981

2981

48 ms

2981

2981

75 ms

3096

3096

16 ms

Accessibility Review

debates.economist.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

debates.economist.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

debates.economist.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Debates.economist.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Debates.economist.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

debates.economist.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Debates Economist. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: