Tools & Wizards About Us
digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy Industry

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

60 ms

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Digital Oil Field 2022 Energy Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...

Visit digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,040 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

132 ms

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

400 ms

bootstrap.css

479 ms

font-awesome.min.css

326 ms

animate.css

389 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com, 53% (27 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (670 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.0 kB (13%)

Content Size

513.0 kB

After Optimization

446.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com main page is 513.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 381.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 42.1 kB

  • Original 55.6 kB
  • After minification 54.9 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 18.2 kB
  • After minification 14.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Digital Oil Field 2022 Energy Tech Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 381.2 kB
  • After minification 381.2 kB
  • After compression 376.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 51.0 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (76%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Oil Field 2022 Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

132 ms

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

400 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

479 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

326 ms

animate.css

animate.css

389 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

271 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

274 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

280 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

332 ms

style1.css

style1.css

78 ms

main.css

main.css

398 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

344 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

387 ms

css

css

41 ms

css

css

54 ms

css

css

70 ms

js

js

52 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

108 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

126 ms

element.js

element.js

59 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

393 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

670 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

608 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

447 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

455 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

458 ms

main.js

main.js

607 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

608 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

608 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

669 ms

custom.js

custom.js

668 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

669 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

182 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

294 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

92 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

154 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

181 ms

load.gif

load.gif

153 ms

x.png

x.png

152 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

125 ms

font

font

155 ms

css

css

110 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

130 ms

font

font

125 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

108 ms

collect

collect

107 ms

ads

ads

105 ms

container.html

container.html

39 ms

js

js

49 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

96 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

94 ms

Accessibility Review

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digital-oil-field-2022.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digital Oil Field 2022 Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: