Tools & Wizards About Us
digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy Industry

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

152 ms

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Digital Oil Field Energy Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...

Visit digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,890 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

134 ms

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

506 ms

bootstrap.css

310 ms

font-awesome.min.css

252 ms

animate.css

258 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com, 51% (42 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

984.0 kB

After Optimization

863.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com main page is 984.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 633.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 61.4 kB

  • Original 79.5 kB
  • After minification 78.9 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 211.8 kB
  • After minification 208.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Oil Field Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 38.5 kB

  • Original 633.1 kB
  • After minification 633.0 kB
  • After compression 594.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (62%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Oil Field Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

134 ms

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

506 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

310 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

252 ms

animate.css

animate.css

258 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

271 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

275 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

274 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

320 ms

style1.css

style1.css

145 ms

main.css

main.css

316 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

332 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

336 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

80 ms

css

css

80 ms

js

js

68 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

134 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

157 ms

element.js

element.js

79 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

334 ms

style.css

style.css

142 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

144 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

184 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

189 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

189 ms

jquery.flipbox.js

jquery.flipbox.js

195 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

488 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

488 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

487 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

487 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

487 ms

main.js

main.js

487 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

612 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

610 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

611 ms

custom.js

custom.js

611 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

610 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

198 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

320 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

100 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

194 ms

load.gif

load.gif

334 ms

450x308_9sg6.webp

450x308_9sg6.webp

348 ms

450x308_d185.jpg

450x308_d185.jpg

349 ms

6slvgUntitled-10.webp

6slvgUntitled-10.webp

349 ms

mczteUntitled-3.webp

mczteUntitled-3.webp

457 ms

6uym300400849984.jpg

6uym300400849984.jpg

457 ms

dcpq7300.jpg

dcpq7300.jpg

491 ms

450x308_236G.jpg

450x308_236G.jpg

457 ms

450x308_7xi9.jpg

450x308_7xi9.jpg

457 ms

450x308_9T18.webp

450x308_9T18.webp

458 ms

0q7csranking-1.jpg

0q7csranking-1.jpg

490 ms

450x308_tLUV.jpg

450x308_tLUV.jpg

491 ms

450x308_o3AU.jpg

450x308_o3AU.jpg

491 ms

450x308_lt12.jpg

450x308_lt12.jpg

492 ms

x.png

x.png

492 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

192 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

158 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

401 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

220 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zIZiVbJ.ttf

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zIZiVbJ.ttf

174 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q17jitOh.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q17jitOh.ttf

178 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q17jitOh.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q17jitOh.ttf

181 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtbK-F2qO0g.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtbK-F2qO0g.ttf

146 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

467 ms

css

css

116 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

154 ms

collect

collect

122 ms

ads

ads

147 ms

container.html

container.html

83 ms

js

js

59 ms

450x308_9sg6.webp

450x308_9sg6.webp

291 ms

6slvgUntitled-10.webp

6slvgUntitled-10.webp

291 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

270 ms

16126521053395641330

16126521053395641330

178 ms

icon.png

icon.png

175 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

177 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

177 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

45 ms

ads

ads

31 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

60 ms

Accessibility Review

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digital-oil-field.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digital Oil Field Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: