Tools & Wizards About Us
e-arth.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

e-arth.in

Earth Solutions | IT, Development, Consulting | Pune, Solapur

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

342 ms

e-arth.in screenshot

About Website

Visit e-arth.in now to see the best up-to-date Earth content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about e-arth.in

Software Development Company which comprises of Industry Experts with a vast experience in Technology, Management and Consulting with 200+ clients.

Visit e-arth.in

Key Findings

We analyzed E-arth.in page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

e-arth.in performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

e-arth.in

12 ms

www.e-arthsolutions.com

31 ms

www.e-arthsolutions.com

30 ms

css

33 ms

font-awesome.min.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original E-arth.in, 76% (32 requests) were made to E-arthsolutions.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source E-arthsolutions.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.0 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of E-arth.in main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 40.6 kB

  • Original 51.6 kB
  • After minification 43.4 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Earth images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 298.0 kB
  • After minification 298.0 kB
  • After compression 292.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 30.4 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E-arth.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (46%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Earth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

e-arth.in

e-arth.in

12 ms

www.e-arthsolutions.com

www.e-arthsolutions.com

31 ms

www.e-arthsolutions.com

www.e-arthsolutions.com

30 ms

css

css

33 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

46 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1087 ms

animate.css

animate.css

823 ms

blueimp-gallery.min.css

blueimp-gallery.min.css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

506 ms

custom-css.css

custom-css.css

642 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

846 ms

api.js

api.js

56 ms

js

js

85 ms

jssor.slider-25.0.7.min.js

jssor.slider-25.0.7.min.js

847 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

935 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

1431 ms

touchSwipe.min.js

touchSwipe.min.js

823 ms

respond.js

respond.js

1289 ms

jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js

jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js

1480 ms

script.js

script.js

1084 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

63 ms

logo-e.png

logo-e.png

450 ms

netsuite.jpg

netsuite.jpg

1241 ms

amazon.jpg

amazon.jpg

1234 ms

enterprise-portals.jpg

enterprise-portals.jpg

1378 ms

ux-ui.jpg

ux-ui.jpg

1558 ms

devops.jpg

devops.jpg

1577 ms

spt.png

spt.png

1082 ms

ashnik.png

ashnik.png

1536 ms

rc.png

rc.png

1692 ms

richfeel.png

richfeel.png

1675 ms

python.png

python.png

1811 ms

php.png

php.png

1985 ms

Java.png

Java.png

1987 ms

apple.png

apple.png

2048 ms

android.png

android.png

2105 ms

cloud.png

cloud.png

2164 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

25 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

27 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

27 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

2286 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

9 ms

Accessibility Review

e-arth.in accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

e-arth.in best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

e-arth.in SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-arth.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that E-arth.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

e-arth.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Earth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: