Tools & Wizards About Us
e-gmat.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

e-gmat.com

Page Load Speed

951 ms in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

693 ms

Page Rendered

79 ms

e-gmat.com screenshot

About Website

Visit e-gmat.com now to see the best up-to-date E Gmat content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about e-gmat.com

Visit e-gmat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed E-gmat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 772 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

e-gmat.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,870 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.089

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

e-gmat.com

179 ms

e-gmat.com

316 ms

js

61 ms

runtime.dba98e727a357a9d.js

49 ms

polyfills.7b1ddcc993eae1d2.js

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original E-gmat.com, 55% (6 requests) were made to Cdn.e-gmat.com and 9% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) belongs to the original domain E-gmat.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 503.3 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

678.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of E-gmat.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 475.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 673.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 475.3 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-98%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 20.3 kB
  • After minification 545 B
  • After compression 480 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E-gmat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 98% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (67%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Gmat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

e-gmat.com

e-gmat.com

179 ms

e-gmat.com

e-gmat.com

316 ms

js

js

61 ms

runtime.dba98e727a357a9d.js

runtime.dba98e727a357a9d.js

49 ms

polyfills.7b1ddcc993eae1d2.js

polyfills.7b1ddcc993eae1d2.js

55 ms

scripts.68ed26d13e2edc19.js

scripts.68ed26d13e2edc19.js

55 ms

main.315a1bc06de9222f.js

main.315a1bc06de9222f.js

79 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

50 ms

font_nunito.css

font_nunito.css

3 ms

styles.794df18b80042a55.css

styles.794df18b80042a55.css

3 ms

m98ci7f1

m98ci7f1

40 ms

Accessibility Review

e-gmat.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

e-gmat.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

e-gmat.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-gmat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that E-gmat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

e-gmat.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Gmat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: