8.2 sec in total
962 ms
6.8 sec
365 ms
Visit e-i.ma now to see the best up-to-date E I content for Morocco and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about e-i.ma
Engineering Inside est née en novembre 2006 à la fois en France et au Maroc. Objectif : Proposer des prestations de production digitale au forfait aux agences de publicités françaises Elle est fondé...
Visit e-i.maWe analyzed E-i.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 962 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
e-i.ma performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value5.2 s
22/100
25%
Value3.6 s
86/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value5.6 s
69/100
10%
962 ms
158 ms
156 ms
156 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original E-i.ma, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Sinejaneser.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (19%)
6.0 MB
4.8 MB
In fact, the total size of E-i.ma main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E I images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 553.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 553.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 405.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E-i.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 405.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (70%)
96
29
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E I. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.e-i.ma
962 ms
everslider.css
158 ms
simplegrid.css
156 ms
style.css
156 ms
ajax-load-more.css
161 ms
styles.css
158 ms
shortcode.css
232 ms
style.css
232 ms
bwg_frontend.css
228 ms
font-awesome.css
232 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
235 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
237 ms
settings.css
307 ms
style.css
307 ms
bootstrap.css
383 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
310 ms
jplayer.css
313 ms
font-awesome.css
313 ms
event-manager.css
379 ms
css
24 ms
css
35 ms
social_icons_widget.css
399 ms
gmw.css
400 ms
column-style.css
400 ms
wp-ulike.css
401 ms
jquery.js
537 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
453 ms
tie.js
456 ms
jsapi
18 ms
wp-ulike-scripts.js
455 ms
wp-ulike-plugins.js
464 ms
ajax-login-script.js
473 ms
ajax-signup-script.js
530 ms
core.min.js
530 ms
widget.min.js
531 ms
position.min.js
569 ms
mouse.min.js
571 ms
sortable.min.js
605 ms
flowplayer.css
560 ms
mediaQhome.css
828 ms
wp-subscribe.css
480 ms
datepicker.min.js
490 ms
menu.min.js
501 ms
autocomplete.min.js
549 ms
resizable.min.js
550 ms
draggable.min.js
481 ms
button.min.js
490 ms
dialog.min.js
505 ms
events-manager.js
550 ms
bwg_frontend.js
548 ms
jquery.mobile.js
550 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
491 ms
jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js
501 ms
bwg_gallery_box.js
543 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
624 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
549 ms
html5shive.js
475 ms
jquery.everslider.min.js
494 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
531 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
564 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js
561 ms
ajax-load-more.min.js
569 ms
jquery.form.min.js
554 ms
scripts.js
554 ms
cp_loader.js
561 ms
underscore-min.js
567 ms
bootstrap.js
583 ms
frontend_scripts.js
555 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
556 ms
gmw.js
523 ms
jquery.min.php
3293 ms
eilogo.jpg
694 ms
staticmap
152 ms
menuBg.png
89 ms
IMG_1077.jpg
540 ms
Slid_IMG_1118.jpg
859 ms
IMG_1510.jpg
561 ms
exp11.jpg
232 ms
rejoindre1-e1420509259923.jpg
244 ms
IMG_3153.jpg
774 ms
fb.png
327 ms
shaz.png
735 ms
flasheur1-300x212.jpg
615 ms
profils_devlop-web-300x212.jpg
632 ms
10937635_1589600637938965_1477900081_n-300x212.jpg
695 ms
IMG_1098-300x212.jpg
710 ms
profils_teleop-380x2201-300x212.jpg
1170 ms
IMG_8760-300x212.jpg
774 ms
IMG_1770.jpg
870 ms
facebook.jpg
813 ms
googleplus.jpg
850 ms
linkedin.jpg
852 ms
pinterest.jpg
895 ms
twitter.jpg
927 ms
youtube.jpg
928 ms
eibl.png
930 ms
totop.png
948 ms
preload.gif
957 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
41 ms
Replica-Regular.otf
984 ms
Replica-Light.otf
958 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
60 ms
analytics.js
53 ms
collect
12 ms
e-i.ma accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
e-i.ma best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
e-i.ma SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-i.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that E-i.ma main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
e-i.ma
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E I. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: