Tools & Wizards About Us
e-mark.shop screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

e-mark.shop

e-mark mobile printing

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

305 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

e-mark.shop screenshot

About Website

Visit e-mark.shop now to see the best up-to-date E Mark content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about e-mark.shop

Create and personalise your DIY-projects. Design in the app and print it easily on almost every surface.

Visit e-mark.shop

Key Findings

We analyzed E-mark.shop page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

e-mark.shop performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,440 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

e-mark.shop

305 ms

mobile-printing

1368 ms

1ac02837eeb1394166319b8e57636ac2.min.css

211 ms

styles-l.min.css

302 ms

coloptheme.min.css

305 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original E-mark.shop, 92% (85 requests) were made to Colop.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Webcache-eu.datareporter.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Colop.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 383.8 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of E-mark.shop main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 197.4 kB

  • Original 231.5 kB
  • After minification 228.5 kB
  • After compression 34.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 96.4 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Mark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 58.3 kB
  • After minification 58.3 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 87.5 kB

  • Original 120.6 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 33.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E-mark.shop needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (12%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

78

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

e-mark.shop

e-mark.shop

305 ms

mobile-printing

mobile-printing

1368 ms

1ac02837eeb1394166319b8e57636ac2.min.css

1ac02837eeb1394166319b8e57636ac2.min.css

211 ms

styles-l.min.css

styles-l.min.css

302 ms

coloptheme.min.css

coloptheme.min.css

305 ms

ea06e44d46cd5aa69f2589c3ce694e39.min.js

ea06e44d46cd5aa69f2589c3ce694e39.min.js

402 ms

menu_en_eur.css

menu_en_eur.css

305 ms

banner.css

banner.css

498 ms

v2

v2

24 ms

trad.js

trad.js

81 ms

inlineretarget.js

inlineretarget.js

93 ms

banner.js

banner.js

1085 ms

X6119367B87F30B7459E98A2DE8EFD0F9.js

X6119367B87F30B7459E98A2DE8EFD0F9.js

20 ms

custom.css

custom.css

105 ms

print.min.css

print.min.css

103 ms

colop-logo.svg

colop-logo.svg

103 ms

icon_colop-group_1.jpg

icon_colop-group_1.jpg

102 ms

icon_business-policy_1.jpg

icon_business-policy_1.jpg

200 ms

icon_team_1.jpg

icon_team_1.jpg

101 ms

icon_working-at-colop_1.jpg

icon_working-at-colop_1.jpg

126 ms

icon_certificates-awards_1.jpg

icon_certificates-awards_1.jpg

201 ms

family-printerline-250x250_3.jpg

family-printerline-250x250_3.jpg

201 ms

rootimgicon.jpg

rootimgicon.jpg

202 ms

heavyduty_250x250_2.jpg

heavyduty_250x250_2.jpg

225 ms

eos-line_400x400_2.jpg

eos-line_400x400_2.jpg

398 ms

family-greenline-250x250_1.jpg

family-greenline-250x250_1.jpg

300 ms

family-pocketstamps-250x250_2.jpg

family-pocketstamps-250x250_2.jpg

301 ms

family-bandstamps-250x250_2.jpg

family-bandstamps-250x250_2.jpg

303 ms

family-diy-sets-250x250_1.jpg

family-diy-sets-250x250_1.jpg

400 ms

family-motivationalstamps-250x250_2024_1.jpg

family-motivationalstamps-250x250_2024_1.jpg

325 ms

family-embossingpress-250x250_1.jpg

family-embossingpress-250x250_1.jpg

400 ms

family-inks-pads-250x250_1.jpg

family-inks-pads-250x250_1.jpg

403 ms

e-mark-go_side_250x250_1_2.jpg

e-mark-go_side_250x250_1_2.jpg

402 ms

create_product_250x250_1_3.jpg

create_product_250x250_1_3.jpg

425 ms

emark_product_250x250_5.jpg

emark_product_250x250_5.jpg

498 ms

Icon_Support_1.jpg

Icon_Support_1.jpg

500 ms

ladot-250x250_1.jpg

ladot-250x250_1.jpg

602 ms

Design_ohne_Titel_8__1.png

Design_ohne_Titel_8__1.png

605 ms

make1_250x250_1.jpg

make1_250x250_1.jpg

502 ms

woodies-miniwoodies-product-overview_website.jpg

woodies-miniwoodies-product-overview_website.jpg

525 ms

NIO_250x250_1_2.jpg

NIO_250x250_1_2.jpg

603 ms

may-and-berry_1.jpg

may-and-berry_1.jpg

604 ms

e-mark-go_side.jpg

e-mark-go_side.jpg

606 ms

create_product_white_1200x1200.jpg

create_product_white_1200x1200.jpg

634 ms

emark_white_product_1200x1200_2.jpg

emark_white_product_1200x1200_2.jpg

706 ms

colop_emark_go-bundle_22.jpg

colop_emark_go-bundle_22.jpg

705 ms

colop_emark_go-bundle_35.jpg

colop_emark_go-bundle_35.jpg

707 ms

go_boxes_group.jpg

go_boxes_group.jpg

709 ms

go_usecase_ribbonguide_hand_whitedesk.jpg

go_usecase_ribbonguide_hand_whitedesk.jpg

710 ms

create_packaging_group2.jpg

create_packaging_group2.jpg

728 ms

emark_packaging_group.jpg

emark_packaging_group.jpg

785 ms

e-mark_box_cartridge_c2.jpg

e-mark_box_cartridge_c2.jpg

715 ms

13-550x1100.jpg

13-550x1100.jpg

801 ms

12-2-550x1100.jpg

12-2-550x1100.jpg

714 ms

9-square-550x1100.jpg

9-square-550x1100.jpg

875 ms

Kalan-Krafting-Picture-1-550x1100.jpg

Kalan-Krafting-Picture-1-550x1100.jpg

629 ms

CIOCCOLATERIA_MARINELLO_Still-550x1100.jpg

CIOCCOLATERIA_MARINELLO_Still-550x1100.jpg

801 ms

UV_blog11-960x540.jpg

UV_blog11-960x540.jpg

801 ms

ZB-COL-Use-Case-Textilshop-EN-Hi-Final_Moment-550x1100.jpg

ZB-COL-Use-Case-Textilshop-EN-Hi-Final_Moment-550x1100.jpg

704 ms

divider_shot2-550x1100.jpg

divider_shot2-550x1100.jpg

704 ms

Creative_Impulse_Awards_COLOP_Logo.jpg

Creative_Impulse_Awards_COLOP_Logo.jpg

704 ms

GIA22_GOLD_250x250.jpg

GIA22_GOLD_250x250.jpg

710 ms

GermanDesign_RGB-250x250.png

GermanDesign_RGB-250x250.png

727 ms

NAOPA_PREV-250x250.png

NAOPA_PREV-250x250.png

777 ms

EOPA-250x250.png

EOPA-250x250.png

803 ms

if_designaward2020_red_l_cmyk-250x250.jpg

if_designaward2020_red_l_cmyk-250x250.jpg

704 ms

Certificate-Editors-Choise-Award-250x250.jpg

Certificate-Editors-Choise-Award-250x250.jpg

704 ms

Singarpur_PIE_Winner_corp-250x250.jpg

Singarpur_PIE_Winner_corp-250x250.jpg

708 ms

Innovation_Excellence_Award_Winner-250x250.jpg

Innovation_Excellence_Award_Winner-250x250.jpg

727 ms

RedDot_RGB-250x250.jpg

RedDot_RGB-250x250.jpg

777 ms

DasB_ro_Top100_Label_2019-250x250.jpg

DasB_ro_Top100_Label_2019-250x250.jpg

706 ms

mastercard.png

mastercard.png

706 ms

visa.png

visa.png

709 ms

paypal.png

paypal.png

704 ms

icon_facebook.png

icon_facebook.png

697 ms

icon_instagram.png

icon_instagram.png

697 ms

icon_linkedin.png

icon_linkedin.png

698 ms

icon_youtube.png

icon_youtube.png

698 ms

icon_tiktok.png

icon_tiktok.png

699 ms

colop-icons.woff

colop-icons.woff

649 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

695 ms

Austria.png

Austria.png

694 ms

Germany.png

Germany.png

695 ms

Netherlands.png

Netherlands.png

695 ms

Belgium.png

Belgium.png

713 ms

France.png

France.png

697 ms

Luxembourg.png

Luxembourg.png

691 ms

Switzerland.png

Switzerland.png

688 ms

CHilger_2019-01-16_D85_1965-1920x1080-c_1.jpg

CHilger_2019-01-16_D85_1965-1920x1080-c_1.jpg

689 ms

go_usecase_bulletjournal.jpg

go_usecase_bulletjournal.jpg

784 ms

logo-emark-create_small.png

logo-emark-create_small.png

614 ms

e-mark-logo_small.png

e-mark-logo_small.png

629 ms

Accessibility Review

e-mark.shop accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

e-mark.shop best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

e-mark.shop SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-mark.shop can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that E-mark.shop main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

e-mark.shop

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: