2.8 sec in total
342 ms
2.2 sec
283 ms
Click here to check amazing E RT2012 content for Morocco. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about e-rt2012.fr
Notre bureau d'études thermiques réalise vos études RT2012, du permis de construire à la fin de travaux, sur des maisons individuelles et des grands projets
Visit e-rt2012.frWe analyzed E-rt2012.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 342 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
e-rt2012.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value17.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value2,390 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.289
42/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
342 ms
532 ms
31 ms
159 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original E-rt2012.fr, 16% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) belongs to the original domain E-rt2012.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 469.3 kB (65%)
721.1 kB
251.8 kB
In fact, the total size of E-rt2012.fr main page is 721.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 550.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 137.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 331.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 331.7 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (86%)
58
8
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E RT2012. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
e-rt2012.fr
342 ms
www.e-rt2012.fr
532 ms
css
31 ms
mkhb-render.css
159 ms
layerslider.css
241 ms
styles.css
242 ms
core-styles.6.10.0.css
334 ms
components-full.6.10.0.css
243 ms
mkhb-row.css
251 ms
mkhb-column.css
254 ms
mkhb-logo.css
319 ms
mkhb-button.css
320 ms
mkhb-navigation.css
325 ms
select.css
341 ms
main.css
341 ms
wysiwyg.css
399 ms
switcher.css
398 ms
js_composer.min.css
584 ms
theme-options-production-1720171289.css
415 ms
shortcodes-styles.min.css
605 ms
style.css
423 ms
webfontloader.js
478 ms
jquery.min.js
488 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
495 ms
layerslider.utils.js
629 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
734 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
570 ms
rs6.css
504 ms
index.js
649 ms
index.js
649 ms
rbtools.min.js
761 ms
rs6.min.js
762 ms
comment-reply.min.js
649 ms
smoothscroll.js
656 ms
core-scripts.6.10.0.js
959 ms
components-full.6.10.0.js
760 ms
mkhb-render.js
857 ms
mkhb-column.js
856 ms
api.js
37 ms
mkhb-navigation-burger.js
872 ms
mkhb-navigation-responsive.js
796 ms
mkhb-navigation-script.js
712 ms
mkhb-navigation.js
923 ms
shortcodes-scripts.min.js
923 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
914 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
910 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
847 ms
index.js
870 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
863 ms
css
68 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf
112 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf
112 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf
208 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf
229 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf
227 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf
227 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
228 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
225 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
228 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
281 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
281 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
279 ms
gtm.js
211 ms
logo.png
573 ms
1-rt-2012-en-ligne.jpg
574 ms
slider.jpg
574 ms
3-conception-bioclimatique.jpg
575 ms
espace-client-kesia-e-RT2012.PNG
602 ms
paiement-securise.png
602 ms
85a09432-fc47-8224-7564-dc61a253b212_js_button_asynchrone.php
579 ms
v2.zopim.com
294 ms
asset_composer.js
247 ms
recaptcha__en.js
179 ms
e-rt2012.fr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
e-rt2012.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
e-rt2012.fr SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-rt2012.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that E-rt2012.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
e-rt2012.fr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E RT2012. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: