7.5 sec in total
1.8 sec
5.2 sec
437 ms
Click here to check amazing E RT2012 content for Morocco. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about e-rt2012.fr
Notre bureau d'études thermiques réalise vos études RT2012, du permis de construire à la fin de travaux, sur des maisons individuelles et des grands projets
Visit e-rt2012.frWe analyzed E-rt2012.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
e-rt2012.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value15.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value2,680 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.181
67/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
1797 ms
247 ms
324 ms
166 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original E-rt2012.fr, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain E-rt2012.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (75%)
2.6 MB
666.6 kB
In fact, the total size of E-rt2012.fr main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 145.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E RT2012 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 705.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 705.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E-rt2012.fr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (80%)
54
11
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E RT2012. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.e-rt2012.fr
1797 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
247 ms
dashicons.min.css
324 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
166 ms
layerslider.css
165 ms
css
24 ms
styles.css
166 ms
settings.css
241 ms
media.css
244 ms
styles.css
496 ms
theme-icons.css
407 ms
css
35 ms
style.css
259 ms
custom.css
320 ms
js_composer.css
666 ms
jquery.js
510 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
399 ms
q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js
400 ms
greensock.js
564 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
567 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
489 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
807 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
576 ms
conversion.js
19 ms
core.min.js
511 ms
widget.min.js
571 ms
mouse.min.js
573 ms
resizable.min.js
582 ms
draggable.min.js
731 ms
button.min.js
731 ms
position.min.js
731 ms
dialog.min.js
747 ms
wpdialog.min.js
748 ms
jquery.form.min.js
747 ms
scripts.js
762 ms
smoothscroll.js
763 ms
comment-reply.min.js
763 ms
scripts.js
1088 ms
wp-embed.min.js
764 ms
js_composer_front.js
690 ms
logo.png
85 ms
1-rt-2012-en-ligne.jpg
327 ms
3-conception-bioclimatique.jpg
314 ms
demonstration-espace-client.png
326 ms
paiement-securise.png
314 ms
fonts-icomoon.woff
660 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
392 ms
85a09432-fc47-8224-7564-dc61a253b212_js_button_asynchrone.php
432 ms
79 ms
widget_v2.134.js
26 ms
172 ms
__$$__stringtable_lang_fr.js
49 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
collect
85 ms
collect
184 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
43 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
43 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
43 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
40 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
41 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
41 ms
skin.css
94 ms
jquery.ajax.portfolio.js
94 ms
media.css
82 ms
85a09432-fc47-8224-7564-dc61a253b212_wf1_7.png
202 ms
e-rt2012.fr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
e-rt2012.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
e-rt2012.fr SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-rt2012.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that E-rt2012.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
e-rt2012.fr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E RT2012. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: