Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

e4.com

E4 | Stream free on Channel 4

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

532 ms

e4.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing E4 content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about e4.com

The online home of E4, with the latest video, news and gossip from your favourite E4 shows

Visit e4.com

Key Findings

We analyzed E4.com page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

e4.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,380 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

e4.com

219 ms

e4

298 ms

adrum.js

44 ms

all4nav.css

27 ms

all4nav.font.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original E4.com, 71% (87 requests) were made to Static.bips.channel4.com and 11% (14 requests) were made to All4nav.channel4.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (336 ms) relates to the external source Rtax.criteo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (59%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

960.9 kB

In fact, the total size of E4.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 164.3 kB

  • Original 185.3 kB
  • After minification 164.2 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 28.2 kB

  • Original 732.3 kB
  • After minification 704.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E4 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 275.1 kB

  • Original 407.8 kB
  • After minification 396.3 kB
  • After compression 132.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 275.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 908.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 103.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E4.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 908.7 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (17%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

84

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E4. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

e4.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

e4.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

e4.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E4.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that E4.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E4. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: