Tools & Wizards About Us
eaging.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

eaging.net

Anti Aging Treatment

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

223 ms

eaging.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing E Aging content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eaging.net

anti aging treatment and more

Visit eaging.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Eaging.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eaging.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.eaging.net

1130 ms

style.css

71 ms

tubepress.css

213 ms

jquery.js

256 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

205 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Eaging.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Media.markethealth.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Eaging.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 821.5 kB (36%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eaging.net main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 30.3 kB

  • Original 38.6 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 305.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, E Aging needs image optimization as it can save up to 305.3 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 252.1 kB

  • Original 405.1 kB
  • After minification 403.2 kB
  • After compression 153.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.1 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 233.8 kB

  • Original 280.9 kB
  • After minification 270.3 kB
  • After compression 47.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eaging.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (28%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Aging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.eaging.net

www.eaging.net

1130 ms

style.css

style.css

71 ms

tubepress.css

tubepress.css

213 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

256 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

205 ms

tubepress.js

tubepress.js

212 ms

jd.gallery.css.php

jd.gallery.css.php

633 ms

jd.gallery.css

jd.gallery.css

168 ms

mootools.v1.11.js

mootools.v1.11.js

307 ms

jd.gallery.js.php

jd.gallery.js.php

713 ms

jd.gallery.transitions.js

jd.gallery.transitions.js

291 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

306 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

249 ms

ga.js

ga.js

25 ms

bannerServer.php

bannerServer.php

198 ms

image-5463722-11166929

image-5463722-11166929

21 ms

bannerServer.php

bannerServer.php

290 ms

bannerServer.php

bannerServer.php

198 ms

topnav9.png

topnav9.png

200 ms

rss.gif

rss.gif

200 ms

antiagingtreatment_header.png

antiagingtreatment_header.png

339 ms

logo.png

logo.png

670 ms

navbar9.png

navbar9.png

200 ms

topnav.png

topnav.png

198 ms

homepagetop.gif

homepagetop.gif

201 ms

img19.jpg

img19.jpg

502 ms

img17.jpg

img17.jpg

527 ms

img18.png

img18.png

676 ms

img20.jpg

img20.jpg

543 ms

img16.jpg

img16.jpg

544 ms

img1.jpg

img1.jpg

576 ms

img2.jpg

img2.jpg

594 ms

img6.jpg

img6.jpg

611 ms

img15.jpg

img15.jpg

618 ms

img14.jpg

img14.jpg

651 ms

img131.jpg

img131.jpg

668 ms

thumbnail.png

thumbnail.png

1200 ms

img3.jpg

img3.jpg

692 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

717 ms

img71.jpg

img71.jpg

793 ms

img8.jpg

img8.jpg

746 ms

img9.jpg

img9.jpg

742 ms

img10.jpg

img10.jpg

759 ms

img11.jpg

img11.jpg

795 ms

featuredtop.gif

featuredtop.gif

797 ms

headline9.png

headline9.png

800 ms

sidebartop.gif

sidebartop.gif

814 ms

icon.gif

icon.gif

847 ms

leftsidebartop.gif

leftsidebartop.gif

848 ms

rightsidebartop.gif

rightsidebartop.gif

865 ms

11166929-1455728539472

11166929-1455728539472

179 ms

J9QApCHsrJk

J9QApCHsrJk

79 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

32 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

52 ms

base.js

base.js

75 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

38 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

72 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

64 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

65 ms

SEO Factors

eaging.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eaging.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eaging.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eaging.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Aging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: