Tools & Wizards About Us
eagleviewsecurity.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

eagleviewsecurity.com

Home

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

eagleviewsecurity.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to eagleviewsecurity.com homepage info - get ready to check Eagleviewsecurity best content right away, or after learning these important things about eagleviewsecurity.com

Home page

Visit eagleviewsecurity.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eagleviewsecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eagleviewsecurity.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eagleviewsecurity.com

1013 ms

1935 ms

stylesheet.css

467 ms

thickbox.css

470 ms

jquery.jcarousel.css

468 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Eagleviewsecurity.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Currency.me.uk and 2% (1 request) were made to Exchangerates.org.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Eagleviewsecurity.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 184.0 kB (39%)

Content Size

470.1 kB

After Optimization

286.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eagleviewsecurity.com main page is 470.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 262.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 23.1 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 262.2 kB
  • After minification 227.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eagleviewsecurity needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 103.3 kB

  • Original 151.5 kB
  • After minification 149.3 kB
  • After compression 48.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 23.2 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eagleviewsecurity.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (48%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eagleviewsecurity. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eagleviewsecurity.com

eagleviewsecurity.com

1013 ms

1935 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

467 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

470 ms

jquery.jcarousel.css

jquery.jcarousel.css

468 ms

jquery-1.3.2.min.js

jquery-1.3.2.min.js

705 ms

thickbox-compressed.js

thickbox-compressed.js

472 ms

tab.js

tab.js

477 ms

jquery.jcarousel.pack.js

jquery.jcarousel.pack.js

704 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

943 ms

roknewsflash.js

roknewsflash.js

721 ms

general.css

general.css

721 ms

template.css

template.css

722 ms

ER-CCCS2-1.php

ER-CCCS2-1.php

265 ms

us.gif

us.gif

171 ms

bg_top.gif

bg_top.gif

235 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

720 ms

shadow.jpg

shadow.jpg

236 ms

mod_bottom.gif

mod_bottom.gif

237 ms

mod_lr.gif

mod_lr.gif

242 ms

s.gif

s.gif

239 ms

space.gif

space.gif

469 ms

mod.gif

mod.gif

470 ms

1_to_4_way_dc_power_cable-120x120.jpg

1_to_4_way_dc_power_cable-120x120.jpg

472 ms

digidoor-120x120.jpg

digidoor-120x120.jpg

479 ms

20111124144015580479-120x120.jpg

20111124144015580479-120x120.jpg

483 ms

700-120x120.jpg

700-120x120.jpg

933 ms

3DK-120x120.jpg

3DK-120x120.jpg

704 ms

2.1mm%20shop-120x120.jpg

2.1mm%20shop-120x120.jpg

703 ms

segate-h.disk_1-120x120.jpg

segate-h.disk_1-120x120.jpg

950 ms

psula-120x120.jpg

psula-120x120.jpg

722 ms

20111124134818539385-120x120.jpg

20111124134818539385-120x120.jpg

940 ms

8-in-16-out-120x120.jpg

8-in-16-out-120x120.jpg

940 ms

3-121123160920408-120x120.jpg

3-121123160920408-120x120.jpg

951 ms

9016-120x120.jpg

9016-120x120.jpg

961 ms

ew700-120x120.jpg

ew700-120x120.jpg

1397 ms

js168_access_control_rs485-120x120.jpg

js168_access_control_rs485-120x120.jpg

1174 ms

9chHybridSmall-120x120.jpg

9chHybridSmall-120x120.jpg

1174 ms

50mIR800tvl4mm_100x100-120x120.jpg

50mIR800tvl4mm_100x100-120x120.jpg

1184 ms

content_top_left.png

content_top_left.png

1179 ms

content_top_right.png

content_top_right.png

1191 ms

content_top_center.png

content_top_center.png

1399 ms

content_bottom_left.png

content_bottom_left.png

1398 ms

content_bottom_right.png

content_bottom_right.png

1412 ms

content_bottom_center.png

content_bottom_center.png

1413 ms

ER-CCCS2-2.php

ER-CCCS2-2.php

182 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

1424 ms

ER-CCCS2-JS.js

ER-CCCS2-JS.js

175 ms

ER-CCCS2-AJAX.php

ER-CCCS2-AJAX.php

170 ms

ER-CCCS2-AJAX.php

ER-CCCS2-AJAX.php

176 ms

Accessibility Review

eagleviewsecurity.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

eagleviewsecurity.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

eagleviewsecurity.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eagleviewsecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eagleviewsecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eagleviewsecurity.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eagleviewsecurity. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: