Tools & Wizards About Us
eamancare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

eamancare.com

Eaman Physical Therapy|Physical Therapy Rockville MD|Physical Therapy Bethesda MD|Physical Therapy Gaithersburg MD|Physical Therapist Rockville MD|Phy...

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

262 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

eamancare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit eamancare.com now to see the best up-to-date Eaman Care content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eamancare.com

We are an outpatient physical therapy clinic based in Maryland. We provide physical therapy, massage therapy, and custom foot orthotics to patients of all ages and conditions. We combine traditional p...

Visit eamancare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eamancare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eamancare.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value17,080 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.149

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eamancare.com

262 ms

www.eamancare.com

197 ms

standard-css-simplywhite-ltr-ltr.css

14 ms

overlay.css

150 ms

allthemes-view.css

149 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Eamancare.com, 20% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 17% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (280 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 382.6 kB (54%)

Content Size

702.6 kB

After Optimization

320.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eamancare.com main page is 702.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 397.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 32.4 kB
  • After minification 32.4 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 22.5 kB

  • Original 167.5 kB
  • After minification 145.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eaman Care needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 105.1 kB
  • After minification 105.1 kB
  • After compression 80.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 312.2 kB

  • Original 397.6 kB
  • After minification 397.4 kB
  • After compression 85.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eamancare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 312.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (42%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eaman Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eamancare.com

eamancare.com

262 ms

www.eamancare.com

www.eamancare.com

197 ms

standard-css-simplywhite-ltr-ltr.css

standard-css-simplywhite-ltr-ltr.css

14 ms

overlay.css

overlay.css

150 ms

allthemes-view.css

allthemes-view.css

149 ms

jot_min_view__en.js

jot_min_view__en.js

145 ms

tree_ltr.gif

tree_ltr.gif

177 ms

x6YdtOQhKR0

x6YdtOQhKR0

280 ms

cleardot.gif

cleardot.gif

216 ms

309c91c4b7141100.jpg

309c91c4b7141100.jpg

233 ms

6a760f2844926c29.png

6a760f2844926c29.png

216 ms

39ba9e0e2838a0dd.jpg

39ba9e0e2838a0dd.jpg

217 ms

customLogo.gif

customLogo.gif

226 ms

facebook_logo.png

facebook_logo.png

226 ms

site_banner.jpg

site_banner.jpg

247 ms

lazy.min.js

lazy.min.js

76 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

67 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

148 ms

base.js

base.js

217 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

64 ms

tz

tz

226 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

209 ms

N-glfAdKYzT-XJtXMnJ3qh3-rjUBbmLP98GeN0asvmo.js

N-glfAdKYzT-XJtXMnJ3qh3-rjUBbmLP98GeN0asvmo.js

176 ms

embed.js

embed.js

37 ms

id

id

33 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

163 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

167 ms

Create

Create

161 ms

ga.js

ga.js

51 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

Accessibility Review

eamancare.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

eamancare.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eamancare.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eamancare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eamancare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eamancare.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eaman Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: