Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

earcon.co.nz

Earcon Home - Specialist Acousticians - Building and Environmental

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

620 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

567 ms

earcon.co.nz screenshot

About Website

Visit earcon.co.nz now to see the best up-to-date Earcon content for New Zealand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about earcon.co.nz

Our team are specialists in Acoustics, Noise and Vibration control.

Visit earcon.co.nz

Key Findings

We analyzed Earcon.co.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 620 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

earcon.co.nz performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

earcon.co.nz

620 ms

earcon.css

392 ms

bootstrap.min.css

612 ms

theme.min.css

1011 ms

color-defaults.min.css

398 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Earcon.co.nz, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Earcon.co.nz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 215.4 kB (4%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Earcon.co.nz main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

  • Original 67.8 kB
  • After minification 34.6 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.2 kB, which is 49% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 78.7 kB

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Earcon images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 40.0 kB

  • Original 309.1 kB
  • After minification 309.1 kB
  • After compression 269.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 35.6 kB

  • Original 127.4 kB
  • After minification 127.4 kB
  • After compression 91.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Earcon.co.nz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (37%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Earcon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

earcon.co.nz accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

earcon.co.nz best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

earcon.co.nz SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Earcon.co.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Earcon.co.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Earcon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: