3.9 sec in total
492 ms
3.1 sec
274 ms
Visit eastwood.agency now to see the best up-to-date EASTWOOD content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eastwood.agency
Eastwood Agency - ????????? ?? ??????????? ??????? ?? ?????????? ? ?????????? ?????????????. ???????? ??????? ? ????????? ????? ?? ?????????.
Visit eastwood.agencyWe analyzed Eastwood.agency page load time and found that the first response time was 492 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
eastwood.agency performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value350 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value16.9 s
5/100
10%
492 ms
33 ms
138 ms
244 ms
422 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Eastwood.agency, 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Eastwood.agency.
Page size can be reduced by 519.6 kB (14%)
3.6 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Eastwood.agency main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 377.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, EASTWOOD needs image optimization as it can save up to 377.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 117.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.8 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eastwood.agency has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (38%)
34
21
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EASTWOOD. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eastwood.agency
492 ms
all.min.css
33 ms
core.min.css
138 ms
page_7bf890d1e2633ca0912d7306d7b25434_v1.css
244 ms
template_04327f063923d601ac9a9dcf6c0df495_v1.css
422 ms
core.min.js
530 ms
kernel_main_v1.js
528 ms
kernel_main_polyfill_customevent_v1.js
298 ms
dexie.bitrix.bundle.min.js
529 ms
core_ls.min.js
365 ms
core_frame_cache.min.js
528 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
template_3679adc4520091f4dfa921293c3ea54e_v1.js
736 ms
page_af04f45f41de298dabcfad106fca16d1_v1.js
630 ms
eastwood_logo_S_%D0%A1.png
341 ms
70bd5fbd1c3fedf64622da5aa0af9881.jpg
309 ms
9541976d7b972a1a8c36ffd6e74962ea.jpg
1222 ms
ac417ac913695465e3c663a3fe7b1e74.jpg
421 ms
e9857b721fa79890455a9c84d494d64e.jpg
496 ms
4da19c00623315594feaff2cb9b72120.jpg
878 ms
e9098c6b17a805a9049e5f5470f12ae6.jpeg
1387 ms
eac5739769fc7b19aa5e2700fc211b3b.jpeg
1293 ms
ab7812b9efa908d8d5243806e9269bcc.png
803 ms
19335fd0f7311508aa86b38b8e446d43.png
637 ms
dc2d5609b693df2847ba785683c16aa8.jpg
764 ms
c1dc78b6532ff8a563407ad76118caa5.png
894 ms
0442b0b01e5aa06ed6889b488af0974f.png
927 ms
46ffdfd0ba43f904c189589df8f4af5c.png
1000 ms
1bd632b27d178873359469e6cd4fd9b3.png
1033 ms
36a810ad6d8a68728505c2eb746fcf72.png
1516 ms
33ba5530f8cfed7eba555a851e087b51.png
1219 ms
Gerbera.woff
1056 ms
Gerbera-Medium.woff
1092 ms
Gerbera-Light.woff
1321 ms
Gerbera-Bold.woff
1177 ms
Gerbera-Black.woff
1222 ms
ba.js
144 ms
tag.js
791 ms
bx_stat
72 ms
advert.gif
796 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
145 ms
eastwood.agency accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
eastwood.agency best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eastwood.agency SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eastwood.agency can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Eastwood.agency main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
eastwood.agency
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EASTWOOD. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: