Tools & Wizards About Us
eatible.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

eatible.co.uk

View Food Safety Scores on the Doors Ratings for Takeaways Pubs and Restaurants

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

220 ms

Resources Loaded

911 ms

Page Rendered

129 ms

eatible.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit eatible.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Eatible content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eatible.co.uk

Find out what food hygiene score your local takeaway, pub, restaurant, school canteen or hospital has been given at its last inspection by food safety officers.

Visit eatible.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Eatible.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 220 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eatible.co.uk performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,370 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.137

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eatible.co.uk

220 ms

bootstrap.min.css

437 ms

jquery.min.js

28 ms

bootstrap.min.js

364 ms

search-food.js

365 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Eatible.co.uk, 29% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (437 ms) belongs to the original domain Eatible.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.9 kB (6%)

Content Size

322.7 kB

After Optimization

303.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eatible.co.uk main page is 322.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 258.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 18.4 kB
  • After minification 17.3 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 15.7 kB
  • After minification 15.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eatible images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 258.6 kB
  • After minification 258.6 kB
  • After compression 257.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 29.9 kB
  • After minification 29.9 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eatible.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (50%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eatible. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eatible.co.uk

eatible.co.uk

220 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

437 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

28 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

364 ms

search-food.js

search-food.js

365 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

59 ms

cse.js

cse.js

52 ms

eatible_300x79.png

eatible_300x79.png

104 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

169 ms

cse_element__en.js

cse_element__en.js

20 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

43 ms

default.css

default.css

43 ms

async-ads.js

async-ads.js

19 ms

branding.png

branding.png

12 ms

Accessibility Review

eatible.co.uk accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

eatible.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eatible.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eatible.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eatible.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eatible.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eatible. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: