11.4 sec in total
1.8 sec
8.9 sec
726 ms
Welcome to ebara.es homepage info - get ready to check Ebara best content for Spain right away, or after learning these important things about ebara.es
Visit ebara.esWe analyzed Ebara.es page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ebara.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.065
97/100
15%
Value17.4 s
4/100
10%
1822 ms
2657 ms
100 ms
313 ms
321 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Ebara.es, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Ebara.es.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (46%)
4.3 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ebara.es main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 159.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 273.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ebara needs image optimization as it can save up to 273.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 887.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 887.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 651.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ebara.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 651.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (53%)
75
35
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ebara. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ebara.es
1822 ms
www.ebara.es
2657 ms
jquery.min.js
100 ms
jquery.cssmap.js
313 ms
language-selector.css
321 ms
cssmap-spain.css
496 ms
mapaEspana.css
340 ms
redComercial.css
340 ms
layerslider.css
350 ms
css
200 ms
settings.css
461 ms
visual-form-builder.min.css
469 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.css
566 ms
farbtastic.css
566 ms
navigation.css
574 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
609 ms
cms-navigation.css
621 ms
style.css
644 ms
font-awesome.css
654 ms
animations.css
657 ms
media.css
684 ms
ipad.css
768 ms
referencias.css
786 ms
greensock.js
811 ms
jquery.js
1104 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
817 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
982 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
911 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1192 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
958 ms
css
79 ms
css
132 ms
api.js
248 ms
comment-reply.min.js
743 ms
modernizr-min.js
826 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
886 ms
jquery.cycle.js
885 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
911 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
958 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
1016 ms
main.js
1296 ms
sitepress.js
1024 ms
style.css
947 ms
recaptcha__en.js
360 ms
es.png
350 ms
Logo-EBARA-con-frase1.png
309 ms
New-EVMS-slice-2016.jpg
1387 ms
Slice-EVMS-MCE.jpg
1605 ms
Ego_new_Slice.jpg
1647 ms
New-EVMS-slice-2016-2.jpg
1376 ms
EVMS-4_Slice.jpg
1377 ms
Slice-Video-EVMS.jpg
1375 ms
Slice-Video-3M1.jpg
1379 ms
Slice-Video-3M2.jpg
1359 ms
Ego_Slice.jpg
2159 ms
VideoEBARA_Slice.jpg
1639 ms
Fondo_slice-grupos.jpg
2186 ms
Foto1_slice-grupos1.jpg
2180 ms
Foto3_slice-grupos.jpg
2242 ms
Foto2_slice-grupos1.jpg
2108 ms
ebara-empresa-espana-300x191.jpg
455 ms
LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff
218 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
217 ms
8c9q46CAcsp9TiRX9KLgZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
218 ms
icomoon.woff
1679 ms
90011.jpg
316 ms
140011.jpg
316 ms
tecni.jpg
317 ms
apli.png
1284 ms
soft.png
438 ms
not.jpg
1277 ms
logo.png
437 ms
logoCepreven.jpg
1784 ms
b5ba37390413eb44a61ba1d8ca12e400-300x111.jpg
1945 ms
Logo_Shacho_Kai1.jpg
2052 ms
Conaif-logos-300x182.jpg
2157 ms
Asimccaf-logo1.jpg
2155 ms
loader.gif
924 ms
coloredbg.png
940 ms
shadow-top.png
112 ms
shadow-bottom.png
106 ms
ebara.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ebara.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ebara.es SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ebara.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ebara.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ebara.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ebara. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: