Tools & Wizards About Us
ebena.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

ebena.net

Ebena | appointment scheduling and e-commerce app for beauty professionals

Page Load Speed

12.5 sec in total

First Response

515 ms

Resources Loaded

10.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

ebena.net screenshot

About Website

Visit ebena.net now to see the best up-to-date Ebena content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ebena.net

Ebena is an appointment scheduling and e-commerce app for beauty professionals to sell their services and products. Our services include scheduling, booking, payment processing, eCommerce, and feature...

Visit ebena.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ebena.net page load time and found that the first response time was 515 ms and then it took 12 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ebena.net performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ebena.net

515 ms

ebena.net

1849 ms

google_tag.script-qnnn9m.js

905 ms

css_c8ul1vl4omwv6mtvoyvtizum33-kskf6ywmwqowfjiw.css

1163 ms

css_nqcupposumcizfzze6qm62jp1hoelpdcgcbewya8iw8.css

1557 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ebena.net, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ebena.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 621.2 kB (9%)

Content Size

7.1 MB

After Optimization

6.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ebena.net main page is 7.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 113.6 kB

  • Original 142.9 kB
  • After minification 139.7 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 506.4 kB

  • Original 6.7 MB
  • After minification 6.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ebena images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 180 B

  • Original 182.5 kB
  • After minification 182.5 kB
  • After compression 182.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 997 B

  • Original 82.1 kB
  • After minification 82.0 kB
  • After compression 81.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ebena.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (69%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ebena. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ebena.net

ebena.net

515 ms

ebena.net

ebena.net

1849 ms

google_tag.script-qnnn9m.js

google_tag.script-qnnn9m.js

905 ms

css_c8ul1vl4omwv6mtvoyvtizum33-kskf6ywmwqowfjiw.css

css_c8ul1vl4omwv6mtvoyvtizum33-kskf6ywmwqowfjiw.css

1163 ms

css_nqcupposumcizfzze6qm62jp1hoelpdcgcbewya8iw8.css

css_nqcupposumcizfzze6qm62jp1hoelpdcgcbewya8iw8.css

1557 ms

icon

icon

31 ms

css_y0ifvftjn3opgwht5wkddy7_clbxadbcecfm0yx9f2y.css

css_y0ifvftjn3opgwht5wkddy7_clbxadbcecfm0yx9f2y.css

1454 ms

css

css

49 ms

icon

icon

57 ms

jssocials.css

jssocials.css

1459 ms

jssocials-theme-flat.css

jssocials-theme-flat.css

1482 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1488 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1725 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1678 ms

post-653.css

post-653.css

1677 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1701 ms

global.css

global.css

1721 ms

post-779.css

post-779.css

1790 ms

css

css

25 ms

js

js

62 ms

style.css

style.css

1923 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

1750 ms

js_rglbjwt6a_v7fjn-ucrxdnhf3zkikighj6rnzc_d9gy.js

js_rglbjwt6a_v7fjn-ucrxdnhf3zkikighj6rnzc_d9gy.js

2102 ms

jssocials.min.js

jssocials.min.js

1750 ms

js_srm8bjavipy9bxriavcyx5_0c13_lu8jtkn5xrxggda.js

js_srm8bjavipy9bxriavcyx5_0c13_lu8jtkn5xrxggda.js

1791 ms

beacon.min.js

beacon.min.js

1798 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1908 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1919 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

1984 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

2027 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2167 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

2163 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

2287 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2238 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

2283 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2369 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

2422 ms

boise.js

boise.js

2211 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1915 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1721 ms

tampa.js

tampa.js

1839 ms

memphis.js

memphis.js

2034 ms

raleigh.js

raleigh.js

2120 ms

tulsa.js

tulsa.js

2220 ms

minneapolis.js

minneapolis.js

2233 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

2457 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

2252 ms

ebena-white.png

ebena-white.png

2356 ms

4-1024x759.png

4-1024x759.png

3667 ms

3-1-1024x759.png

3-1-1024x759.png

4244 ms

5-1024x759.png

5-1024x759.png

3905 ms

9-1024x759.png

9-1024x759.png

3633 ms

10-1024x759.png

10-1024x759.png

3654 ms

11-1024x759.png

11-1024x759.png

3416 ms

12-1024x759.png

12-1024x759.png

4430 ms

SKT-%EC%86%8C%EC%95%A1%ED%95%9C%EB%8F%84-%ED%99%95%EC%9D%B8-%EB%B3%80%EA%B2%BD.png

SKT-%EC%86%8C%EC%95%A1%ED%95%9C%EB%8F%84-%ED%99%95%EC%9D%B8-%EB%B3%80%EA%B2%BD.png

4271 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3ig.ttf

16 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3ig.ttf

19 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3ig.ttf

23 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTQ3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTQ3ig.ttf

28 ms

KT-%EC%86%8C%EC%95%A1%EA%B2%B0%EC%A0%9C-%ED%95%9C%EB%8F%84-%ED%99%95%EC%9D%B8-%EB%B3%80%EA%B2%BD-01.png

KT-%EC%86%8C%EC%95%A1%EA%B2%B0%EC%A0%9C-%ED%95%9C%EB%8F%84-%ED%99%95%EC%9D%B8-%EB%B3%80%EA%B2%BD-01.png

4108 ms

LG-%EC%86%8C%EC%95%A1%EA%B2%B0%EC%A0%9C-%ED%95%9C%EB%8F%84-%ED%99%95%EC%9D%B8-%EB%B3%80%EA%B2%BD-01.png

LG-%EC%86%8C%EC%95%A1%EA%B2%B0%EC%A0%9C-%ED%95%9C%EB%8F%84-%ED%99%95%EC%9D%B8-%EB%B3%80%EA%B2%BD-01.png

4098 ms

Pretendard-Bold.woff

Pretendard-Bold.woff

4466 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

4 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

11 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

38 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

38 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

37 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

38 ms

Pretendard-Medium.woff

Pretendard-Medium.woff

4523 ms

Pretendard-Regular.woff

Pretendard-Regular.woff

5063 ms

Pretendard-Black.woff

Pretendard-Black.woff

4727 ms

13-1024x759.png

13-1024x759.png

5162 ms

15-1-1024x759.png

15-1-1024x759.png

6045 ms

14-1024x759.png

14-1024x759.png

4594 ms

jellyfish.webp

jellyfish.webp

4573 ms

0.png

0.png

4767 ms

1-1.png

1-1.png

4741 ms

2-1.png

2-1.png

4941 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

50 ms

rochester.js

rochester.js

426 ms

vitals.js

vitals.js

439 ms

css_y4h_4bqmgyctg7e7ydsets2qvy9c34c51kbamddgark.css

css_y4h_4bqmgyctg7e7ydsets2qvy9c34c51kbamddgark.css

264 ms

Accessibility Review

ebena.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ebena.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ebena.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ebena.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ebena.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ebena.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ebena. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: