1.6 sec in total
14 ms
1 sec
557 ms
Click here to check amazing E Bible content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ebible.com
The Bible
Visit ebible.comWe analyzed Ebible.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
ebible.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value2.2 s
95/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
14 ms
644 ms
199 ms
19 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Ebible.com, 17% (5 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (644 ms) belongs to the original domain Ebible.com.
Page size can be reduced by 126.6 kB (28%)
458.2 kB
331.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ebible.com main page is 458.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 169.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.3 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Bible images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ebible.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (26%)
27
20
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Bible. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ebible.com
14 ms
ebible.com
644 ms
gtm.js
199 ms
application-d09ab5d05a314a070131827907a7241197a11fd022796609505daa30d9a794c9.css
19 ms
logo-vert.png
63 ms
my_picture.jpg
200 ms
jquery.min.js
83 ms
ads.js
52 ms
application-e31b118a3a4125a280b14aa5bdb3ea9601ceaee8c473a3b8cc94b0cf3cf0714c.js
63 ms
ebible.verselink.js
63 ms
Profile_Pic.jpg
184 ms
amonite_spiritual_answers_in_scripture_inspirational_logo_a166979a-fcd5-40e1-ac24-6c7050f8ec78.jpg
182 ms
IMG_5726.jpg
183 ms
IMG_20190104_110408.jpg
184 ms
feed.png
71 ms
medium.png
69 ms
feed.png
70 ms
feed.png
69 ms
feed.png
71 ms
feed.png
71 ms
icons.png
34 ms
sprite-master.png
36 ms
icon-search.png
33 ms
print.css
2 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
verselink.css
44 ms
ga.js
92 ms
js
48 ms
collect
17 ms
ebible.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ebible.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ebible.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ebible.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ebible.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ebible.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E Bible. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: