Tools & Wizards About Us
ecap-project.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

ecap-project.org

SBOBET: Link Daftar SBOBET88 WAP Terpercaya dan Panduan Lengkap Taruhan Bola

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

552 ms

Resources Loaded

701 ms

Page Rendered

364 ms

ecap-project.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ecap Project content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ecap-project.org

SBOBET adalah situs utama taruhan judi bola terpercaya yang sudah dikenal oleh masyarakat luas.

Visit ecap-project.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ecap-project.org page load time and found that the first response time was 552 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ecap-project.org performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ecap-project.org

552 ms

v0.js

35 ms

amp-carousel-0.1.js

60 ms

amp-image-lightbox-0.1.js

66 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ecap-project.org, 60% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 20% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (552 ms) belongs to the original domain Ecap-project.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.1 kB (18%)

Content Size

196.1 kB

After Optimization

161.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ecap-project.org main page is 196.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 148.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

  • Original 48.1 kB
  • After minification 44.0 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 181 B

  • Original 148.0 kB
  • After minification 148.0 kB
  • After compression 147.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ecap Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ecap-project.org

ecap-project.org

552 ms

v0.js

v0.js

35 ms

amp-carousel-0.1.js

amp-carousel-0.1.js

60 ms

amp-image-lightbox-0.1.js

amp-image-lightbox-0.1.js

66 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

amp-analytics-0.1.js

67 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

32 ms

css

css

34 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

18 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

24 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

27 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

29 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsI.woff

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsI.woff

5 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsI.woff

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsI.woff

15 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsI.woff

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsI.woff

3 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff

5 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsI.woff

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsI.woff

15 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKQ.woff

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKQ.woff

16 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

33 ms

Accessibility Review

ecap-project.org accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ecap-project.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ecap-project.org SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecap-project.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ecap-project.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ecap-project.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ecap Project. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: