1.1 sec in total
39 ms
979 ms
60 ms
Visit ecerto.io now to see the best up-to-date ECERTO content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ecerto.io
eCERTO transforms the sustainability and financial performance of Capital Projects across industries with the adoption of INTEGRATI® and provision of eAPPRAISAL services
Visit ecerto.ioWe analyzed Ecerto.io page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
ecerto.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value5.7 s
52/100
10%
Value1,540 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
39 ms
41 ms
42 ms
89 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ecerto.io, 35% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (409 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 358.9 kB (50%)
717.7 kB
358.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Ecerto.io main page is 717.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 378.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 289.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 289.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ECERTO needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 59.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)
24
13
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ECERTO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ecerto.io
39 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
41 ms
minified.js
42 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
89 ms
polyfill.min.js
219 ms
thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js
85 ms
main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js
85 ms
lodash.min.js
84 ms
react.production.min.js
83 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
87 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
87 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
87 ms
eCERTO_All%20Logos_3.png
382 ms
7e669d_40fa83eb07c9497284a0c8e5018ee8df~mv2.png
278 ms
eCERTO_All%20Logos-16.jpg
267 ms
eAPPRAISAL_TCP_Primary_V-29.png
290 ms
eCCERTO_Pre-SEED%20II.jpg
309 ms
7e669d_75ba7f157ca84dffb7be2f1682b6f463~mv2.png
242 ms
7e669d_f72380b998f8435a83130b73d53dcbd9~mv2.png
389 ms
7e669d_eb6af0242c7446bb987223c1f4dd4e2b~mv2.png
409 ms
bundle.min.js
82 ms
116 ms
121 ms
115 ms
117 ms
111 ms
113 ms
139 ms
143 ms
139 ms
142 ms
140 ms
139 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
22 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
10 ms
right-arrow.svg
8 ms
ecerto.io accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
ecerto.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ecerto.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecerto.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ecerto.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ecerto.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ECERTO. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: