1.6 sec in total
376 ms
816 ms
436 ms
Click here to check amazing ECETA content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eceta.net
Eceta Dot Net specialized in Facility management in Egypt, Property management Egypt, Property management Egypt and Real Estate Projects management in Egypt
Visit eceta.netWe analyzed Eceta.net page load time and found that the first response time was 376 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
eceta.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.368
29/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
376 ms
28 ms
153 ms
153 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Eceta.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) belongs to the original domain Eceta.net.
Page size can be reduced by 27.1 kB (13%)
210.1 kB
183.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Eceta.net main page is 210.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 131.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ECETA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (35%)
46
30
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ECETA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
eceta.net
376 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
bg.jpg
153 ms
index_05.gif
153 ms
topbg.jpg
155 ms
index_08.jpg
159 ms
index_10.gif
156 ms
index_12.gif
162 ms
index_13.jpg
159 ms
index_14.jpg
165 ms
index_15.gif
166 ms
index_16.jpg
172 ms
index_17.jpg
171 ms
index_18.jpg
166 ms
index_19.jpg
167 ms
index_20.gif
172 ms
index_21.jpg
172 ms
index_22.jpg
174 ms
index_23.gif
215 ms
index_03.gif
201 ms
index_09.gif
201 ms
index_11.gif
203 ms
sspacer.gif
204 ms
slideshowbg.gif
230 ms
ga.js
29 ms
Saudia.png
267 ms
Saudia_mabna.png
302 ms
arkadia002.png
251 ms
Dana-Ghaz.png
307 ms
Sunterra.png
272 ms
index_092.gif
273 ms
index_112.gif
285 ms
added_value003.gif
332 ms
3.jpg
361 ms
index_05.gif
306 ms
eye.jpg
332 ms
index_09.gif
333 ms
index_11.gif
338 ms
index_05.gif
339 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
finish-2.jpg
245 ms
index_09.gif
245 ms
index_11.gif
246 ms
hands.jpg
257 ms
index_26.gif
252 ms
index_27.jpg
299 ms
index_28.gif
266 ms
eceta.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
eceta.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eceta.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
WINDOWS-1256
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eceta.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Eceta.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1256. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
eceta.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ECETA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: