1 sec in total
193 ms
636 ms
193 ms
Click here to check amazing Echarton content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about echarton.com
Eric Charton : Tech Stories Writer, Software Coder and Reproducible Science Researcher Since ... the Last Century
Visit echarton.comWe analyzed Echarton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 829 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
echarton.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.1 s
76/100
10%
193 ms
151 ms
169 ms
154 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Echarton.com, 25% (10 requests) were made to Echarton.files.wordpress.com and 23% (9 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (193 ms) belongs to the original domain Echarton.com.
Page size can be reduced by 256.8 kB (60%)
428.0 kB
171.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Echarton.com main page is 428.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 314.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 453 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Echarton images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 220.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 220.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Echarton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (55%)
29
13
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Echarton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
echarton.com
193 ms
151 ms
css
169 ms
154 ms
159 ms
167 ms
style.css
142 ms
gprofiles.js
132 ms
wpgroho.js
150 ms
148 ms
form.js
148 ms
145 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
153 ms
w.js
129 ms
merriweather.css
15 ms
global-print.css
158 ms
pont_jacques_cartier_51.jpg
133 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
132 ms
button-back.gif
124 ms
tweet.jpg
72 ms
linked.jpg
74 ms
ping-me-icon.png
74 ms
mendeley_icon.jpg
76 ms
soZfbn11PkChMcyPRwvf0evvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
114 ms
Noticons.svg
75 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
72 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
75 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
75 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
75 ms
65 ms
hovercard.css
92 ms
services.css
116 ms
pont_jacques_cartier_51.jpg
61 ms
tweet.jpg
60 ms
ping-me-icon.png
58 ms
linked.jpg
64 ms
mendeley_icon.jpg
57 ms
g.gif
42 ms
g.gif
41 ms
g.gif
40 ms
echarton.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
echarton.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
echarton.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Echarton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Echarton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
echarton.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Echarton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: