Tools & Wizards About Us
eclair.digital screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

eclair.digital

Laboratoire audiovisuel paris | Distribution digitale - Eclair Digital Services

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

187 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

802 ms

eclair.digital screenshot

About Website

Visit eclair.digital now to see the best up-to-date Eclair content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eclair.digital

Eclair Digital Services est spécialisé dans les prestations de distribution digitale et traite tous les contenus dans tous les formats. La vérification et le contrôle qualité, la conformation image et...

Visit eclair.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Eclair.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eclair.digital performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.212

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eclair.digital

187 ms

www.netgem.com

594 ms

fr

221 ms

css2

28 ms

css_fVQs-Z6kGcS70SfZ3MpfEmXefr_PivhIzAR-k84N_c4.css

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eclair.digital, 82% (41 requests) were made to Netgem.com and 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1000 ms) relates to the external source Netgem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.9 kB (2%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eclair.digital main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 52.5 kB

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 58.3 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 15.9 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eclair images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 53 B

  • Original 67.5 kB
  • After minification 67.5 kB
  • After compression 67.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 440 B

  • Original 29.8 kB
  • After minification 29.8 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eclair.digital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (10%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eclair. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eclair.digital

eclair.digital

187 ms

www.netgem.com

www.netgem.com

594 ms

fr

fr

221 ms

css2

css2

28 ms

css_fVQs-Z6kGcS70SfZ3MpfEmXefr_PivhIzAR-k84N_c4.css

css_fVQs-Z6kGcS70SfZ3MpfEmXefr_PivhIzAR-k84N_c4.css

166 ms

css_PdJctunwngrI4nKJu8WgCM7obUMio0jsOg5Tu5dukJ8.css

css_PdJctunwngrI4nKJu8WgCM7obUMio0jsOg5Tu5dukJ8.css

310 ms

css_QWI3B87TrBmZ8G1l5fdtwv_4DqA0_jOzWyZMTPYmpjA.css

css_QWI3B87TrBmZ8G1l5fdtwv_4DqA0_jOzWyZMTPYmpjA.css

326 ms

js_hhmbTulLaqdJ2GwTQ49eUYZBf05OvfgJ4bHeg7QWEaY.js

js_hhmbTulLaqdJ2GwTQ49eUYZBf05OvfgJ4bHeg7QWEaY.js

360 ms

js_2D-WaJ2ePGOfI19UuUG2mNo0rw3b27o59SAJcdnk6Ew.js

js_2D-WaJ2ePGOfI19UuUG2mNo0rw3b27o59SAJcdnk6Ew.js

267 ms

logo-netgem-group.svg

logo-netgem-group.svg

98 ms

btn-lang-fr.jpg

btn-lang-fr.jpg

97 ms

btn-lang-en.jpg

btn-lang-en.jpg

96 ms

fleche-menu.svg

fleche-menu.svg

103 ms

bt-unmute.svg

bt-unmute.svg

99 ms

bt-revoir-video.svg

bt-revoir-video.svg

284 ms

bt-play-video.svg

bt-play-video.svg

286 ms

bt-mute.svg

bt-mute.svg

286 ms

visueleuroland.jpg

visueleuroland.jpg

455 ms

portraits.jpg

portraits.jpg

584 ms

FastLaneCP.jpg

FastLaneCP.jpg

840 ms

Mhalabourse.jpg

Mhalabourse.jpg

695 ms

SFAF0324_0.jpg

SFAF0324_0.jpg

610 ms

zeopCP.jpg

zeopCP.jpg

525 ms

FFEClair.jpg

FFEClair.jpg

612 ms

CesarEPEV.jpg

CesarEPEV.jpg

763 ms

Voeux241_2.jpg

Voeux241_2.jpg

749 ms

picto-une-mission.svg

picto-une-mission.svg

693 ms

picto-un-objectif.svg

picto-un-objectif.svg

696 ms

picto-un-metier.svg

picto-un-metier.svg

779 ms

photo-Mathias-Hautefort-et-Joseph-Haddad-1920-60-corr.jpg

photo-Mathias-Hautefort-et-Joseph-Haddad-1920-60-corr.jpg

865 ms

fleche-scroll-back-4.svg

fleche-scroll-back-4.svg

775 ms

fleche-rond.svg

fleche-rond.svg

833 ms

video-home-poster-1610.jpg

video-home-poster-1610.jpg

849 ms

photo-couple-netgem-tv-image-parallax-full.jpg

photo-couple-netgem-tv-image-parallax-full.jpg

931 ms

picto-abonnes.svg

picto-abonnes.svg

863 ms

picto-ca-decale.svg

picto-ca-decale.svg

917 ms

picto-ebitda.svg

picto-ebitda.svg

921 ms

picto-rse-gaia.svg

picto-rse-gaia.svg

937 ms

fond-graphique-investisseurs-16-9.gif

fond-graphique-investisseurs-16-9.gif

946 ms

bt-linkedin-blanc.svg

bt-linkedin-blanc.svg

950 ms

bt-x-blanc.svg

bt-x-blanc.svg

1000 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff

87 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff

182 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff

205 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff

206 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff

206 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

207 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

207 ms

css_5kldT9pSKa5d49NrRT4_3QDyEYDEUp2wMpcHWtEFto4.css

css_5kldT9pSKa5d49NrRT4_3QDyEYDEUp2wMpcHWtEFto4.css

88 ms

fleche-or-slider.svg

fleche-or-slider.svg

89 ms

Accessibility Review

eclair.digital accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

eclair.digital best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

eclair.digital SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eclair.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eclair.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eclair.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eclair. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: