4.6 sec in total
198 ms
4.1 sec
330 ms
Visit eclipsebook.in now to see the best up-to-date Eclipse Book content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eclipsebook.in
An easy to understand yet thorough guide on using Eclipse for C/C++ Software Development
Visit eclipsebook.inWe analyzed Eclipsebook.in page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
eclipsebook.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value3.4 s
68/100
25%
Value5.2 s
59/100
10%
Value3,100 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
198 ms
51 ms
106 ms
108 ms
578 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Eclipsebook.in, 28% (23 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 11% (9 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.
Page size can be reduced by 215.8 kB (48%)
450.8 kB
235.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Eclipsebook.in main page is 450.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 222.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eclipse Book images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 73.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 73.2 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 116.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eclipsebook.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (66%)
77
26
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eclipse Book. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eclipsebook.in
198 ms
basic.css
51 ms
pygments.css
106 ms
ratatouillespeak.css
108 ms
bootstrap.min.css
578 ms
bootstrap-sphinx.css
115 ms
adsbygoogle.js
561 ms
jquery.min.js
496 ms
underscore.js
113 ms
doctools.js
119 ms
bootstrap.min.js
172 ms
bootstrap-sphinx.js
172 ms
all.js
656 ms
css
146 ms
sdk.js
318 ms
ratu-r_72.png
77 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
489 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
544 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
695 ms
ca-pub-1346386746566643.js
346 ms
zrt_lookup.html
589 ms
show_ads_impl.js
1848 ms
cse.js
136 ms
analytics.js
169 ms
334 ms
412 ms
xd_arbiter.php
210 ms
xd_arbiter.php
424 ms
comments.php
719 ms
cse.js
308 ms
collect
299 ms
jsapi
313 ms
xd_arbiter.php
105 ms
default+en.css
80 ms
minimalist.css
122 ms
default+en.I.js
319 ms
bekMD-lCbkm.css
163 ms
sEpAygasRyW.css
201 ms
43rLqn9Z_-w.css
236 ms
zpY9NNg0Hd6.css
287 ms
XCdv7aD40Gm.js
361 ms
lnwXDK64af8.js
401 ms
mn6tHWuLI-Y.js
269 ms
UMeIUxuSxxa.js
424 ms
wRXOQ26LQ1k.js
313 ms
Pgc3fKJZhcQ.js
398 ms
FONZt65OrrE.js
422 ms
GgEAzsI1Ar2.js
419 ms
yStKz5DsxYX.js
549 ms
VAFHT3WOlau.js
486 ms
xRbzcXUWYBl.js
487 ms
P7JDom76Pfn.js
487 ms
x8BMxYCqTb9.js
545 ms
minimalist.css
33 ms
async-ads.js
1046 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
527 ms
small-logo.png
483 ms
clear.gif
484 ms
nav_logo114.png
486 ms
odA9sNLrE86.jpg
296 ms
ads
517 ms
osd.js
450 ms
comments.php
439 ms
ads
469 ms
1546411_10203332815152049_841182657_n.jpg
157 ms
eRZ-2twM17f.png
85 ms
like.png
91 ms
fav.png
91 ms
1920485_817129261636262_514203597_n.jpg
88 ms
12376530_1033734570003752_4961471825446222717_n.jpg
438 ms
391578_272029489505708_382886052_n.jpg
436 ms
11130210_1035180439844928_3548993825938711400_n.jpg
436 ms
10574347_10154579253858098_5806245910341290948_n.jpg
87 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
351 ms
Fy3hs8lKW0M.png
294 ms
m_js_controller.js
349 ms
abg.js
463 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
227 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
161 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
59 ms
50Trs1RKgUY.js
71 ms
x_button_blue2.png
104 ms
s
62 ms
eclipsebook.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eclipsebook.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eclipsebook.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eclipsebook.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eclipsebook.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eclipsebook.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eclipse Book. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: