Tools & Wizards About Us
eco-cleaners.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

eco-cleaners.co.uk

Eco Cleaners – Manchester

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

798 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

311 ms

eco-cleaners.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Eco Cleaners content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eco-cleaners.co.uk

Visit eco-cleaners.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Eco-cleaners.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 798 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eco-cleaners.co.uk performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eco-cleaners.co.uk

798 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

167 ms

style.min.css

251 ms

theme.min.css

255 ms

header-footer.min.css

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Eco-cleaners.co.uk, 30% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (829 ms) belongs to the original domain Eco-cleaners.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 533.6 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eco-cleaners.co.uk main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 57.8 kB

  • Original 70.4 kB
  • After minification 67.6 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 238.2 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eco Cleaners needs image optimization as it can save up to 238.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 236.9 kB

  • Original 343.9 kB
  • After minification 343.9 kB
  • After compression 107.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 236.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 631 B

  • Original 62.4 kB
  • After minification 62.4 kB
  • After compression 61.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eco-cleaners.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (76%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eco Cleaners. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eco-cleaners.co.uk

eco-cleaners.co.uk

798 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

167 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

251 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

255 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

256 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

343 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

256 ms

style.css

style.css

257 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

335 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

338 ms

global.css

global.css

339 ms

post-17.css

post-17.css

341 ms

css

css

30 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

345 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

425 ms

index.js

index.js

425 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

425 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

425 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

592 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

424 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

604 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

507 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

508 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

603 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

507 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

602 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

678 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

678 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

675 ms

Untitled-design-39.png

Untitled-design-39.png

676 ms

014327-1.png

014327-1.png

829 ms

Untitled-design-40.png

Untitled-design-40.png

575 ms

Untitled-design-41.png

Untitled-design-41.png

660 ms

Untitled-design-42.png

Untitled-design-42.png

659 ms

sbi-sprite.png

sbi-sprite.png

409 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

16 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

21 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

32 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

38 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

41 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

40 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

52 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

39 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

38 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

53 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

53 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

53 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

53 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

54 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

54 ms

Accessibility Review

eco-cleaners.co.uk accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

eco-cleaners.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

eco-cleaners.co.uk SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eco-cleaners.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eco-cleaners.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eco-cleaners.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eco Cleaners. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: