Tools & Wizards About Us
eco.as screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

eco.as

Eco Energy Holding - NOx reduction technologies

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

102 ms

eco.as screenshot

About Website

Visit eco.as now to see the best up-to-date Eco content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eco.as

Eco Energy Holding AS holds the leading technology to convert all kinds of fuel oils into environmentally friendly fuels

Visit eco.as

Key Findings

We analyzed Eco.as page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eco.as performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eco.as

230 ms

eco.as

449 ms

screen.css

104 ms

lightbox.css

207 ms

prototype.js

306 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Eco.as, 3% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (499 ms) belongs to the original domain Eco.as.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 31.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

199.5 kB

After Optimization

168.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eco.as main page is 199.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 154.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 11.5 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 154.2 kB
  • After minification 140.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eco images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 30.8 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 578 B

  • Original 3.0 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eco.as needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 578 B or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (44%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eco.as

eco.as

230 ms

eco.as

eco.as

449 ms

screen.css

screen.css

104 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

207 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

306 ms

scriptaculous.js

scriptaculous.js

302 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

303 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

8 ms

builder.js

builder.js

102 ms

effects.js

effects.js

104 ms

dragdrop.js

dragdrop.js

101 ms

controls.js

controls.js

101 ms

slider.js

slider.js

137 ms

wrap-bg.gif

wrap-bg.gif

106 ms

header.png

header.png

107 ms

eco_logo.png

eco_logo.png

107 ms

flag_gb.png

flag_gb.png

106 ms

flag_it.png

flag_it.png

107 ms

flag_no.png

flag_no.png

210 ms

nav-bg.gif

nav-bg.gif

208 ms

winter.jpg

winter.jpg

499 ms

lwd.png

lwd.png

206 ms

pbf.png

pbf.png

208 ms

snt.png

snt.png

309 ms

page.png

page.png

308 ms

bullet_go.png

bullet_go.png

308 ms

litewhitediesel-small.jpg

litewhitediesel-small.jpg

310 ms

footer-bg.gif

footer-bg.gif

309 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

print.css

print.css

107 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

104 ms

closelabel.gif

closelabel.gif

103 ms

Accessibility Review

eco.as accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

eco.as best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

eco.as SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eco.as can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eco.as main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eco.as

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eco. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: