Tools & Wizards About Us
ecommand.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ecommand.co.uk

e:command - CS-Cart Developer, E-Commerce Developer & Marketplace Developer

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

782 ms

ecommand.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit ecommand.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date E Command content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ecommand.co.uk

If you are looking for a CS-cart developer, an E-Commerce developer or a marketplace developer then visit us here at e:command.

Visit ecommand.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Ecommand.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ecommand.co.uk performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ecommand.co.uk

1321 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

146 ms

classic-themes.min.css

127 ms

style.min.css

260 ms

theme.min.css

147 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Ecommand.co.uk, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ecommand.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 565.4 kB (63%)

Content Size

890.5 kB

After Optimization

325.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ecommand.co.uk main page is 890.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 474.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 135.9 kB

  • Original 163.8 kB
  • After minification 159.0 kB
  • After compression 27.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 7.9 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, E Command needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 249 B

  • Original 244.3 kB
  • After minification 244.3 kB
  • After compression 244.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 428.1 kB

  • Original 474.5 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB
  • After compression 46.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ecommand.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 428.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (93%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Command. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ecommand.co.uk

ecommand.co.uk

1321 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

146 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

127 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

260 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

147 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

166 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

157 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

243 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

279 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

289 ms

global.css

global.css

189 ms

post-129.css

post-129.css

300 ms

post-36.css

post-36.css

328 ms

post-32.css

post-32.css

527 ms

css

css

55 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

642 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

487 ms

js

js

95 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

407 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

427 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

500 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

535 ms

post-15.css

post-15.css

461 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

612 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

612 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

635 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

637 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

769 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

770 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

769 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

835 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

770 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

873 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

947 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

891 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

862 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

891 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

898 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

76 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

888 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1074 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

1038 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

858 ms

w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uJLdshZg.woff

w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uJLdshZg.woff

39 ms

ecommand-Logo-Finalwhite300.png

ecommand-Logo-Finalwhite300.png

129 ms

Accessibility Review

ecommand.co.uk accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ecommand.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ecommand.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecommand.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ecommand.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ecommand.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E Command. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: