4.4 sec in total
1 sec
3.1 sec
333 ms
Visit ecostaff.ru now to see the best up-to-date Ecostaff content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ecostaff.ru
экология и природопользование а также экологическое право в России в области табачной промышленности
Visit ecostaff.ruWe analyzed Ecostaff.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ecostaff.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
1014 ms
329 ms
882 ms
317 ms
394 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Ecostaff.ru, 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ecostaff.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 428.0 kB (67%)
638.6 kB
210.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ecostaff.ru main page is 638.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 422.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ecostaff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 312.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 312.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ecostaff.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (77%)
26
6
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ecostaff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ecostaff.ru
1014 ms
s5_flex_menu.css
329 ms
mootools-core.js
882 ms
core.js
317 ms
caption.js
394 ms
mootools-more.js
1414 ms
s5_flex_menu.js
731 ms
system.css
530 ms
general.css
465 ms
template_default.css
668 ms
template.css
668 ms
com_content.css
746 ms
editor.css
819 ms
thirdparty.css
819 ms
css
44 ms
multibox.css
899 ms
ajax.css
1100 ms
overlay.js
999 ms
multibox.js
1149 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
1027 ms
s5_font_adjuster.js
1079 ms
css
55 ms
system.css
148 ms
3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
230 ms
s5_logo.png
581 ms
BkZwJXYnumPMepfEA344yQ.ttf
62 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
62 ms
arrow.png
230 ms
s5_scroll_arrow.png
265 ms
watch.js
0 ms
watch.js
36 ms
ecostaff.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
ecostaff.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ecostaff.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecostaff.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ecostaff.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ecostaff.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ecostaff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: