1.1 sec in total
99 ms
831 ms
144 ms
Visit ecotope.org now to see the best up-to-date Ecotope content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ecotope.org
Home page of the Laboratory for Anthropogenic Landscape Ecology.
Visit ecotope.orgWe analyzed Ecotope.org page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 975 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
ecotope.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
99 ms
234 ms
36 ms
78 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Ecotope.org, 19% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Accounts.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (322 ms) belongs to the original domain Ecotope.org.
Page size can be reduced by 70.0 kB (11%)
620.5 kB
550.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ecotope.org main page is 620.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 381.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ecotope images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ecotope.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (23%)
26
20
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ecotope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ecotope.org
99 ms
ecotope.org
234 ms
Navigation.css
36 ms
layout.css
78 ms
sharethis.js
124 ms
bg.png
35 ms
ecotope_logO.gif
80 ms
head_BG.png
236 ms
blog_button.gif
79 ms
tl.png
105 ms
tr.png
107 ms
google_earth_anthromes_square_small.jpg
125 ms
ellis_elder_interview_mapping_hunan_2003_07_24.JPG
123 ms
zhangqing_soils_1993_P31_008.JPG
232 ms
ellis_example_of_current_historical_imagery.jpg
201 ms
animated_dianbai.gif
322 ms
globe_thumb_4_200.png
138 ms
ecosynth_logo2.png
204 ms
anthroecosystem.png
204 ms
USED_blog_header5_SMALL.png
230 ms
plusone.js
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
33 ms
fastbutton
30 ms
postmessageRelay
39 ms
102 ms
developers.google.com
268 ms
3604799710-postmessagerelay.js
52 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
9 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
Printing.css
36 ms
ecotope.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
ecotope.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ecotope.org SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecotope.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ecotope.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ecotope.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ecotope. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: