11.5 sec in total
590 ms
10.3 sec
575 ms
Click here to check amazing Edataplus content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about edataplus.com
The domain name edataplus.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit edataplus.comWe analyzed Edataplus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 590 ms and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
edataplus.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value25.3 s
0/100
25%
Value19.4 s
0/100
10%
Value12,880 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value31.3 s
0/100
10%
590 ms
246 ms
479 ms
493 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Edataplus.com, 22% (19 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Edataplus.com.
Page size can be reduced by 759.6 kB (21%)
3.6 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Edataplus.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 192.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.4 kB or 95% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 462.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Edataplus needs image optimization as it can save up to 462.8 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 74.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edataplus.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (68%)
75
24
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edataplus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
edataplus.com
590 ms
bootstrap.min.css
246 ms
style.css
479 ms
responsive.css
493 ms
embed
156 ms
jquery-1.12.4.js
1219 ms
bootstrap.min.js
492 ms
bootsnav.js
510 ms
parallax.js
473 ms
scrollto.js
708 ms
jquery-scrolltofixed-min.js
732 ms
jquery.counterup.js
716 ms
gallery.js
725 ms
wow.min.js
724 ms
slider.js
957 ms
video-player.js
958 ms
jquery.barfiller.js
965 ms
timepicker.js
968 ms
tweetie.js
974 ms
color-switcher.js
1192 ms
newscript.js
1193 ms
logo1.png
1202 ms
h1.jpg
1911 ms
h2.jpg
1663 ms
h3.jpg
1877 ms
hm.png
2378 ms
graduation.png
1452 ms
h1.jpg
1705 ms
h3.jpg
1928 ms
h2.jpg
1891 ms
js
22 ms
gen_204
25 ms
init_embed.js
35 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
1481 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1644 ms
font-awesome-animation.min.css
1665 ms
elegantIcons.css
1683 ms
flaticon.css
1699 ms
pe-icon-7-stroke.css
1721 ms
animate.css
1882 ms
bootsnav.css
1900 ms
fullcalendar.min.css
1928 ms
slider.css
1940 ms
css
62 ms
hover.css
1961 ms
fancyBox.css
2108 ms
owl.css
2096 ms
isotop.css
2117 ms
magnific-popup.css
1935 ms
flipclock.css
1940 ms
timecounter.css
1964 ms
3d-buttons.css
2111 ms
1.jpg
1661 ms
2.jpg
2060 ms
1.jpg
1731 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
279 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
581 ms
Flaticon.svg
6205 ms
Flaticon.woff
279 ms
default.css
562 ms
common.js
238 ms
util.js
356 ms
map.js
720 ms
overlay.js
586 ms
onion.js
550 ms
search_impl.js
548 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
508 ms
embed
398 ms
tweet.php
377 ms
gen_204
28 ms
map.js
52 ms
overlay.js
49 ms
onion.js
46 ms
search_impl.js
46 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
167 ms
kh
108 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
63 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
17 ms
vt
111 ms
QuotaService.RecordEvent
22 ms
vt
61 ms
vt
79 ms
controls.js
7 ms
css
130 ms
css
130 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
16 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
18 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
29 ms
edataplus.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
edataplus.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
edataplus.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edataplus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edataplus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edataplus.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edataplus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: