Tools & Wizards About Us
edefeed.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

edefeed.com

Welcome to Edefeed! Anonymous discussion boards for every place.

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

456 ms

Resources Loaded

906 ms

Page Rendered

78 ms

edefeed.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to edefeed.com homepage info - get ready to check Edefeed best content right away, or after learning these important things about edefeed.com

TOPIX Alternative/replacement - LOCAL anonymous discussion forums, message boards for every place in USA, Canada, United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Pick your county, city, town, village. Start di...

Visit edefeed.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Edefeed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 984 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

edefeed.com performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.edefeed.com

456 ms

fontello.css

74 ms

animation.css

83 ms

bootstrap.css

151 ms

ajaxlivesearch.css

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Edefeed.com, 63% (10 requests) were made to Static.edefeed.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (456 ms) belongs to the original domain Edefeed.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 16.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

92.1 kB

After Optimization

75.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Edefeed.com main page is 92.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 47.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.0 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edefeed images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 310 B

  • Original 47.9 kB
  • After minification 47.9 kB
  • After compression 47.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 33.2 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edefeed.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (40%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edefeed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.edefeed.com

www.edefeed.com

456 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

74 ms

animation.css

animation.css

83 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

151 ms

ajaxlivesearch.css

ajaxlivesearch.css

84 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

224 ms

ajaxlivesearch.min.js

ajaxlivesearch.min.js

84 ms

jquery.simpleSocialShare.min.js

jquery.simpleSocialShare.min.js

246 ms

edefeed.png

edefeed.png

242 ms

edefeed.svg

edefeed.svg

244 ms

AU.svg

AU.svg

177 ms

CA.svg

CA.svg

239 ms

IE.svg

IE.svg

185 ms

UK.svg

UK.svg

193 ms

US.svg

US.svg

201 ms

Accessibility Review

edefeed.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

edefeed.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

edefeed.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edefeed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edefeed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

edefeed.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edefeed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: