Tools & Wizards About Us
edgemont.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

edgemont.org

Home - Edgemont School District

Page Load Speed

524 ms in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

376 ms

Page Rendered

99 ms

edgemont.org screenshot

About Website

Visit edgemont.org now to see the best up-to-date Edgemont content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about edgemont.org

Home - Edgemont School District

Visit edgemont.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Edgemont.org page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 475 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

edgemont.org performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,550 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.57

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

edgemont.org

49 ms

find_school.aspx

106 ms

www.edgemont.org

87 ms

css.axd

100 ms

jquery.min.js

111 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Edgemont.org, 48% (12 requests) were made to Static1cdn.echalk.net and 8% (2 requests) were made to Static2cdn.echalk.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (111 ms) relates to the external source Static3.echalk.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 849.1 kB (81%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

203.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Edgemont.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 908.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 724.6 kB

  • Original 908.6 kB
  • After minification 681.6 kB
  • After compression 184.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 724.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 122.0 kB

  • Original 140.4 kB
  • After minification 102.3 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edgemont.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (91%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edgemont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

edgemont.org

edgemont.org

49 ms

find_school.aspx

find_school.aspx

106 ms

www.edgemont.org

www.edgemont.org

87 ms

css.axd

css.axd

100 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

111 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

33 ms

foundation.mod.css

foundation.mod.css

69 ms

main.css

main.css

46 ms

css

css

26 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

102 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

78 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

75 ms

underscore-min.js

underscore-min.js

42 ms

mustache.js

mustache.js

42 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

42 ms

async.js

async.js

43 ms

json2.js

json2.js

42 ms

eChalkServicesMosaicJS.js

eChalkServicesMosaicJS.js

52 ms

eChalkRenderControlsMosaicJS.js

eChalkRenderControlsMosaicJS.js

51 ms

eChalkRenderTemplates.js

eChalkRenderTemplates.js

39 ms

jstorage.js

jstorage.js

62 ms

custom.modernizr.js

custom.modernizr.js

47 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

62 ms

modFoundationMenu.js

modFoundationMenu.js

61 ms

footer.js

footer.js

40 ms

Accessibility Review

edgemont.org accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

edgemont.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

edgemont.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edgemont.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Edgemont.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

edgemont.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: