6.2 sec in total
169 ms
5.8 sec
196 ms
Click here to check amazing Edgeteam content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about edgeteam.com
EdgeTeam offers specialized IT network design infrastructure and security applications for both enterprise and service providers.
Visit edgeteam.comWe analyzed Edgeteam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
edgeteam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
169 ms
186 ms
24 ms
2368 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Edgeteam.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Edgeteam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 427.7 kB (21%)
2.0 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Edgeteam.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edgeteam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 339.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edgeteam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 339.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (20%)
94
75
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edgeteam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.edgeteam.com
169 ms
default.include.797212.css
186 ms
css
24 ms
2368 ms
222 ms
1238 ms
1174 ms
1228 ms
1356 ms
widgets.js
79 ms
269 ms
328 ms
442 ms
css
29 ms
97 ms
analytics.js
91 ms
37182ca5819cd7282da1bc498e5d1a34_mini.jpeg
76 ms
logo.png
66 ms
blank.gif
64 ms
services-app_mgmt-300x149.png
76 ms
services-business_comm-300x149.png
77 ms
services-business_cont-300x149.png
77 ms
services-colo_hosting-300x149.png
81 ms
services-compliance_srv-300x149.png
104 ms
services-dc_solutions-300x149.png
209 ms
services-ent_sec-300x149.png
210 ms
services-inet_svc-300x149.png
209 ms
services-incident_response-300x149.png
211 ms
services-install_configure-300x149.png
210 ms
services-managed_wifi-300x149.png
212 ms
services-mgd_svc-300x149.png
212 ms
services-net_arch-300x149.png
212 ms
services-network_assess-300x149.png
213 ms
services-net_visibility-300x149.png
214 ms
services-network_security-300x149.png
213 ms
services-sec_assess-300x149.png
214 ms
services-product_svc-300x149.png
215 ms
services-security_test-300x149.png
215 ms
services-staffing_svc-300x149.png
216 ms
a10-c-242x120.png
217 ms
adtran-c-242x120.png
217 ms
aerohive-c-242x120.png
239 ms
anpi-c-242x120.png
241 ms
21ct-c-242x120.png
240 ms
appdynamics-c-242x120.png
262 ms
arbor-c-242x120.png
242 ms
aruba-c-242x120.png
243 ms
arista-c-242x120.png
248 ms
asserrosecurity-c-242x120.png
272 ms
barracuda-c-242x120.png
275 ms
brocade-c-242x120.png
282 ms
carbonblack-c-242x120.png
288 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
12 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
259 ms
collect
43 ms
dell-c-242x120.png
265 ms
cavirin-c-242x120.png
265 ms
extrahop-c-242x120.png
254 ms
hp-c-242x120.png
253 ms
extreme-c-242x120.png
256 ms
fortinet-c-242x120.png
307 ms
gigamon-c-242x120.png
285 ms
skin.css
157 ms
apcon-c-242x120.png
177 ms
juniper-c-242x120.png
177 ms
netrounds-c-242x120.png
177 ms
opendns-c-242x120.png
196 ms
nimble-c-242x120.png
215 ms
optelian-c-242x120.png
220 ms
peerapp-c-242x120.png
209 ms
infoblox-c-242x120.png
209 ms
rad-c-242x120.png
219 ms
rapid7-c-242x120.png
242 ms
radware-c-242x120.png
260 ms
riorey-c-242x120.png
273 ms
procera-c-242x120.png
262 ms
sciencelogic-c-242x120.png
255 ms
skyhigh-c-242x120.png
255 ms
splunk-c-242x120.png
281 ms
solarwinds-c-242x120.png
273 ms
solidfire-c-242x120.png
279 ms
riverbed-c-242x120.png
274 ms
thales-c-242x120.png
275 ms
vmware-c-242x120.png
283 ms
triumfant-c-242x120.png
337 ms
watchful-c-242x120.png
326 ms
grey-logo-footer.png
315 ms
reply_48x16.png
330 ms
retweet_48x16.png
314 ms
favorite_48x16.png
307 ms
slider-assessment-bg-1600x550.png
250 ms
slider-assessment-network.png
70 ms
slider-assessment-security.png
69 ms
slider-prison-trans_block.png
65 ms
slider-assessment-help.png
68 ms
slider-prison-bg-1600x550.png
349 ms
slider-prison-verbiage.png
104 ms
edgeteam.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
edgeteam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
edgeteam.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edgeteam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edgeteam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edgeteam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edgeteam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: