2.5 sec in total
199 ms
1.9 sec
447 ms
Click here to check amazing Edit XML content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about edit-xml.com
Easy XML Editor (Pro), XML Assistant - XML Software
Visit edit-xml.comWe analyzed Edit-xml.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
edit-xml.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value4.1 s
78/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.418
23/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
199 ms
424 ms
108 ms
213 ms
287 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Edit-xml.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn.snipcart.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (670 ms) belongs to the original domain Edit-xml.com.
Page size can be reduced by 203.4 kB (36%)
560.2 kB
356.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Edit-xml.com main page is 560.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 421.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Edit XML needs image optimization as it can save up to 115.9 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 63.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edit-xml.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 50% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (11%)
35
31
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edit XML. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
edit-xml.com
199 ms
edit-xml.com
424 ms
main.css
108 ms
800px.css
213 ms
480px.css
287 ms
snipcart.css
61 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
485 ms
main.js
303 ms
css
31 ms
home.svg
110 ms
editorpro.png
106 ms
editor.png
111 ms
assistant.png
106 ms
editor5.png
248 ms
download_editorpro.png
207 ms
download_macos.svg
208 ms
play_video_easy_xml_editor_pro.png
315 ms
editor2.png
219 ms
entries1.png
377 ms
table7.png
309 ms
search2.png
322 ms
history1.png
328 ms
export2.png
368 ms
modificator2.png
501 ms
part.png
526 ms
download_assistant.png
424 ms
desc1.png
435 ms
desc2.png
474 ms
desc3.png
569 ms
desc4.png
526 ms
editor5.png
543 ms
download_editor.png
580 ms
editor2.png
601 ms
entries1.png
627 ms
tableeditext7.png
631 ms
search2.png
649 ms
history1.png
670 ms
edit-xml.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
edit-xml.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
edit-xml.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edit-xml.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edit-xml.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edit-xml.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edit XML. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: