Tools & Wizards About Us
edit.everyspec.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

edit.everyspec.com

Military Standards MIL-STD, Military specifications MIL SPEC

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

129 ms

edit.everyspec.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to edit.everyspec.com homepage info - get ready to check Edit Every SPEC best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about edit.everyspec.com

Access to over 55,000 standards specifications. Search Government, Military, and NASA Handbooks.

Visit edit.everyspec.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Edit.everyspec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

edit.everyspec.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,790 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

edit.everyspec.com

48 ms

everyspec.com

343 ms

03_blue.css

4 ms

03_round.css

4 ms

nav_blue.css

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Edit.everyspec.com, 17% (9 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (616 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 38.6 kB (5%)

Content Size

749.2 kB

After Optimization

710.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Edit.everyspec.com main page is 749.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 689.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edit Every SPEC images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.3 kB

  • Original 689.4 kB
  • After minification 689.4 kB
  • After compression 674.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 9.7 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edit.everyspec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (61%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edit Every SPEC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

edit.everyspec.com

edit.everyspec.com

48 ms

everyspec.com

everyspec.com

343 ms

03_blue.css

03_blue.css

4 ms

03_round.css

03_round.css

4 ms

nav_blue.css

nav_blue.css

5 ms

every.css

every.css

6 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

11 ms

brand

brand

51 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

87 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

222 ms

brandjs.js

brandjs.js

45 ms

everyspec-logo-4.png

everyspec-logo-4.png

25 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

46 ms

branding.png

branding.png

47 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

30 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

79 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

77 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

229 ms

quant.js

quant.js

65 ms

ga.js

ga.js

34 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

105 ms

rules-p-qfB50UVV5sUrb.js

rules-p-qfB50UVV5sUrb.js

9 ms

rules-p-qfB50UVV5sUrb.js

rules-p-qfB50UVV5sUrb.js

15 ms

pixel;r=458912433;rf=0;a=p-qfB50UVV5sUrb;url=http%3A%2F%2Feveryspec.com%2F;uht=2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1215824945-1722505482429;pbc=;ns=0;ce=1;qjs=1;qv=15f23c9a-20240703164903;cm=;gdpr=0;ref=;d=everyspec.com;dst=0;et=1722505482456;tzo=-180;ogl=;ses=19f7a269-7eca-427d-8bd7-39ad653c259b;mdl=

pixel;r=458912433;rf=0;a=p-qfB50UVV5sUrb;url=http%3A%2F%2Feveryspec.com%2F;uht=2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1215824945-1722505482429;pbc=;ns=0;ce=1;qjs=1;qv=15f23c9a-20240703164903;cm=;gdpr=0;ref=;d=everyspec.com;dst=0;et=1722505482456;tzo=-180;ogl=;ses=19f7a269-7eca-427d-8bd7-39ad653c259b;mdl=

71 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

616 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

267 ms

3636781319-postmessagerelay.js

3636781319-postmessagerelay.js

22 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

8 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

38 ms

ads

ads

221 ms

ads

ads

429 ms

ads

ads

409 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

29 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

244 ms

s

s

21 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

35 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

36 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

22 ms

5f7468413707c3abfd197d65a482477f.js

5f7468413707c3abfd197d65a482477f.js

19 ms

icon.png

icon.png

18 ms

7f032190f136c4d8e9a385e88120dc8d.js

7f032190f136c4d8e9a385e88120dc8d.js

19 ms

af5cf33f216dd68f5f355584e69bf9d6.js

af5cf33f216dd68f5f355584e69bf9d6.js

127 ms

css

css

149 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

29 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

30 ms

activeview

activeview

65 ms

vSn-LAGdw1H8Es98-LL_nT3awXWDHyYlrhLEIRybtG8.js

vSn-LAGdw1H8Es98-LL_nT3awXWDHyYlrhLEIRybtG8.js

7 ms

sodar

sodar

72 ms

activeview

activeview

71 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

7 ms

runner.html

runner.html

5 ms

aframe

aframe

22 ms

Accessibility Review

edit.everyspec.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

edit.everyspec.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

edit.everyspec.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edit.everyspec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edit.everyspec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

edit.everyspec.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edit Every SPEC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: