Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

848 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

630 ms

editormatik.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to editormatik.com homepage info - get ready to check Editormatik best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about editormatik.com

Editormatik.com, haber sitesi editörlüğü, ingilizce site editörlüğü gibi alanlarda faaliyet gösteren kurumsal bir içerik ajansıdır.

Visit editormatik.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Editormatik.com page load time and found that the first response time was 848 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

editormatik.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

editormatik.com

848 ms

style.css

427 ms

css

74 ms

materialdesignicons.css

569 ms

logo.png

427 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Editormatik.com, 27% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Editormatik.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 417.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Editormatik.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 36.8 kB
  • After minification 27.8 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.0 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 133.5 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Editormatik images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 182.3 kB

  • Original 260.2 kB
  • After minification 236.3 kB
  • After compression 77.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 69.7 kB

  • Original 83.0 kB
  • After minification 68.7 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Editormatik.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (29%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Editormatik. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

editormatik.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Editormatik.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Editormatik.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Editormatik. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: