5 sec in total
848 ms
3.9 sec
236 ms
Visit edt.com now to see the best up-to-date EDT content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about edt.com
High performance optical, RF and telecom interfaces for people working at the leading edge of research, industry, and technology.
Visit edt.comWe analyzed Edt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 848 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
edt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.314
37/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
848 ms
140 ms
64 ms
123 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Edt.com, 24% (19 requests) were made to Um.simpli.fi and 6% (5 requests) were made to I.simpli.fi. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Edt.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (61%)
1.8 MB
707.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Edt.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 766.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, EDT needs image optimization as it can save up to 766.5 kB or 56% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 163.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (78%)
50
11
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EDT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
edt.com
848 ms
satelliteLib-7a76f03b7698cecb39e12ad97e96edcda7e8056a.js
140 ms
q-a-plus.css
64 ms
foundation-icons.css
123 ms
style.css
116 ms
edt.com
380 ms
style.min.css
211 ms
jquery.min.js
14 ms
custom.modernizr.js
209 ms
q-a-plus.js
206 ms
comment-reply.min.js
207 ms
foundation.min.js
274 ms
scripts.js
240 ms
wp-embed.min.js
242 ms
gfplaceholderaddon.js
224 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
90 ms
css
32 ms
logo.png
91 ms
home-slide-1.jpg
235 ms
DOG023_slide3.png
2600 ms
DOG023_hware.accel_slide_final.png
989 ms
tracker.php
27 ms
VisitorTrack.js
176 ms
satellite-56ab7d1264746d73e4001928.html
64 ms
satellite-56ab7d5864746d73d8001991.html
90 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
edt.woff
61 ms
dpx.js
54 ms
dpx.js
46 ms
p
20 ms
dpx
6 ms
p
142 ms
aol
6 ms
mapuser
4 ms
vt.aspx
112 ms
y_match
8 ms
ga.js
10 ms
dpx
7 ms
match_redirect
306 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
29931
28 ms
match_redirect
3 ms
tpid=CD29559E5362EE56C1BFBC5902F9D14E
8 ms
lr
10 ms
lr.gif
9 ms
match_redirect
3 ms
sync
7 ms
match_redirect
4 ms
CD29559E5362EE56C1BFBC5902F9D14E
38 ms
match_redirect
4 ms
ProfilesEngineServlet
54 ms
ProfilesEngineServlet
33 ms
tap.php
6 ms
exelate
5 ms
16 ms
18 ms
19 ms
spotx_match
5 ms
fb_match
9 ms
u.php
43 ms
an
4 ms
lj_match
4 ms
merge
6 ms
cw_match
3 ms
rtset
24 ms
rb_match
4 ms
tap.php
9 ms
ox_match
5 ms
pm_match
22 ms
pixel
23 ms
sd
9 ms
Pug
58 ms
g_match
6 ms
pixel
41 ms
aa_px
9 ms
edt.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
edt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
edt.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edt.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EDT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: