886 ms in total
75 ms
697 ms
114 ms
Welcome to ee.net homepage info - get ready to check Ee best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about ee.net
eNET has been Providing Internet Access, Cloud Services, and Colocation to Ohio for more than 15 years. Find out why we are the leader in Internet services in Columbus, Ohio.
Visit ee.netWe analyzed Ee.net page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 811 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
ee.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value5.3 s
72/100
10%
75 ms
250 ms
28 ms
76 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Ee.net, 15% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (353 ms) belongs to the original domain Ee.net.
Page size can be reduced by 89.5 kB (22%)
403.0 kB
313.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ee.net main page is 403.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 182.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ee needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ee.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (14%)
37
32
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ee.net
75 ms
www.ee.net
250 ms
ga.js
28 ms
background-top.png
76 ms
background-topleft.png
201 ms
background-topright.png
229 ms
top.png
229 ms
headerbg.gif
270 ms
cse.js
71 ms
logo.gif
270 ms
headermenu1_bg.gif
268 ms
headermenu2_bg.gif
287 ms
headermenu3_bg.gif
274 ms
headermenu4_bg.gif
270 ms
headermenu5_bg.gif
288 ms
menu_headbg.gif
298 ms
menu_title.gif
303 ms
menu_bg.jpg
291 ms
ad2_01.jpg
338 ms
ad2_03.jpg
329 ms
ad2_04.jpg
337 ms
ad2_05.jpg
340 ms
ad2_06.jpg
353 ms
spacer.gif
325 ms
widgets.js
157 ms
logos.jpg
334 ms
bbb.jpg
345 ms
bottom.png
351 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
cse_element__en.js
28 ms
default+en.css
92 ms
default.css
127 ms
async-ads.js
72 ms
branding.png
42 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
71 ms
clear.png
23 ms
nav_logo114.png
23 ms
settings
97 ms
button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js
21 ms
ee.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ee.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
ee.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ee.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ee.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ee.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ee. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: